State ex rel. Corrigan v. Wheeler, 71-259
Decision Date | 30 June 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 71-259,71-259 |
Citation | 27 Ohio St.2d 9,271 N.E.2d 862 |
Parties | , 56 O.O.2d 5 The STATE ex rel. CORRIGAN, v. WHEELER. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
This is an action in quo warranto originating in this court. In his complaint, relator, as County Prosecutor, alleges that respondent, a City Commissioner of East Cleveland, elected to a four-year term in November 1969, became an employee of the Cuyahoga County Auditor's office on or about July 7, 1970.
Relator contends that by accepting public employment other than that of a notary public or a member of the State Militia, respondent committed an act which worked a forfeiture of his office as City Commissioner. As authority, he cites Section V of the East Cleveland City Charter which provides that a member of the City Commission 'shall not hold any other public office or employment except that of notary public or member of the State Militia.' The charter further provides that any member 'ceasing to possess the qualifications herein provided, shall thereby forfeit his office.'
Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the petition on the basis that this court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter. Respondent points to the first sentence of the last paragraph of Section V of the East Cleveland City Charter which states that '* * * the commission shall be judge of the election and disqualification of its own members.' Respondent argues that on this basis the commission is the sole judge of the qualification or disqualification of its members and that this court is without jurisdiction.
Respondent has stated, by letter to this court, 'that the ruling of the Court on the Motion to Dismiss * * * will be the final disposition of this case.'
Stanton Addams, Cleveland, for relator.
Gaines, Rogers, Horton & Forbes, and Thomas S. Watson, Cleveland, for respondent.
'The judicial power of this state is vested in a Supreme Court, Courts of Appeals, Courts of Common Pleas, and such other courts inferior to the supreme court as may from time to time be established by law.' Article IV, Section 1, Ohio Constitution. Further, Article IV, Section 2 grants to this court original jurisdiction in certain enumerated types of action one of which is 'quo warranto.'
While Section V of the East Cleveland City Charter is a grant to the City Commission to pass on the qualification of its own members, this case does not involve a review of action taken thereunder. Cf. State ex rel. Platz v. Mucci (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 60, 225 N.E.2d 238. The grant of authority to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hitt v. Tressler, 82-221
... ... See, e.g., State, ex rel., v. Berry (1890), 47 Ohio St. 232, 24 N.E. 206, ... State, ex rel. Corrigan, v. Wheeler (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 9, 271 N.E.2d 862 [56 ... ...
-
State ex rel. Cain v. Kay
...of Ohio confer original jurisdiction in quo warranto upon the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals. Cf. State ex rel. Corrigan v. Wheeler (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 9, 271 N.E.2d 862; Ohio ex rel. v. Railway Co. (1895), 53 Ohio St. 189, 41 N.E. 205. The procedure to be employed in an action i......
-
State ex rel. East Cleveland Democratic Club, Inc. v. Bibb
...Court have original jurisdiction in quo warranto proceedings. Section 2, Article IV, Ohio Constitution; State, ex rel. Corrigan, v. Wheeler (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 9, 10, 271 N.E.2d 862 . The corporation's involvement in political activity does not change this court's responsibility to decide......
-
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Jefferson County Bd. of Revision
... ... J., and SCHNEIDER, HERBERT, DUNCAN, CORRIGAN ... ...