State ex rel. D.L. Auld Co. v. Morse, 33729
| Citation | 120 N.E.2d 424,161 Ohio St. 561 |
| Decision Date | 09 June 1954 |
| Docket Number | No. 33729,33729 |
| Parties | , 53 O.O. 422 STATE et rel. D. L. AULD CO., Inc. v. MORSE et al., Industrial Commission of Ohio. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Ohio |
Russell P. Herrold, Jr., and Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, for relator.
C. William O'Neill, Atty. Gen., and Paul Tague, Jr., Columbus, for respondents.
This writ is denied for the reasons stated in support of the decision in State ex rel. Allied Wheel Products, Inc., v. Industrial Commission, Ohio Sup., 120 N.E.2d 421.
Writ denied.
HART, J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial Commission
...Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 161 Ohio St. 555, 120 N.E.2d 421, and State ex rel. D. L. Auld Co., Inc. v. Morse et al., Indus. Comm., 161 Ohio St. 561, 120 N.E.2d 424 (decided on authority of State ex rel. Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, Althoug......
-
State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of Berea
...State ex rel. Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 161 Ohio St. 555, 120 N.E.2d 421; State ex rel. D. L. Auld Co., Inc. v. Morse et al., Indus. Comm., 161 Ohio St. 561, 120 N.E.2d 424; and State ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Indus. Comm., 162 Ohio St. 302, 123 N.E.2d 23, te......
-
State ex rel. Selected Properties v. Gottfried
...ex rel. Allied Wheel Products, Inc., v. Industrial Commission, 161 Ohio St. 555, 120 N.E.2d 421, and State ex rel. D. L. Auld Co., Inc., v. Morse, 161 Ohio St. 561, 120 N.E.2d 424, about a year ago, two of the judges who concurred therein dissented in State ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass C......
-
State ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
...ex rel. Allied Wheel Products, Inc., v. Industrial Commission, 161 Ohio St. 555, 120 N.E.2d 421, and State ex rel. D. L. Auld Co., Inc., v. Morse, 161 Ohio St. 561, 120 N.E.2d 424. The respondent contends also that its action in the premises is lawful and in accord with the statutes and its......
Request a trial to view additional results