State ex rel. Division of Administration v. Oliff, GG-256
| Decision Date | 13 September 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. GG-256,GG-256 |
| Citation | 350 So.2d 484 |
| Parties | STATE ex rel., DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, State of Florida, Department of Transportation, Relator, v. The Honorable R. Hudson OLIFF, as Judge of the Circuit Court, Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Alan E. DeSerio, Robert I. Scanlan, H. Reynolds Sampson, Tallahassee, for relator.
Cecilia A. Bryant of Bryant, Dickens, Franson & Miller, R. Hudson Oliff, Jacksonville, for respondent.
Henrietta Kinnon filed her amended complaint in two counts against the Department of Transportation. The first alleges the location and size of the drainage easement upon her property constitutes a breach of the contract she entered into with the Department. The second alleges false representations by the Department's agents in the making of that contract. The first count sounds in contract and the second in tort. The Department moved to dismiss the complaint since the agreement was entered into in April, 1974, during which time the Department enjoyed sovereign immunity. While sovereign immunity in tort actions has been waived by Section 768.28, Florida Statutes (1975), to the extent of liability coverage, the Department contends such was not the law in April, 1974. Section 768.30 provides the waiver of sovereign immunity for tort did not take effect for the Department until July 1, 1974. As to count two, the Department argues it was and is immune from contract actions.
The trial court denied the motion to dismiss and suggestion for writ of prohibition was filed in this court.
A rule nisi was entered and Ms. Kinnon answered. As to the question of tort immunity, she alleged in her complaint the construction of the drainage easement was not completed until on or after January 15, 1975. She contends it was not until that time that she could have known of any cause of action she may have against the Department. This, of course, would be after the effective date of Section 768.28. This cause of action, sounding as it does in fraud, 1 accrues when the fraud or deceit was or should have been discovered. Section 95.031(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Tullo v. Horner, 296 So.2d 502 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974). The question of discovery is a factual one, not appropriately passed upon at the pleadings stage. The trial judge correctly denied the motion to dismiss as to the first count.
Ms. Kinnon next argues Section 337.19(1), Florida Statutes (1975), allows contract actions against the Department. That section reads:
"Suits at law and in equity may be brought and maintained by and against the department on any claim under contract for work done; provided that no suit sounding in tort shall be maintained against the department."
This action is not one based on a claim "under contract for work done" and is not applicable here. Statutes purporting to waive sovereign...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Department of Transp. v. Burnette
...if at all.7 The idea that the State impliedly contracts to pay for its torts was rejected in State ex rel. Division of Administration v. Oliff, 350 So.2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).8 Kendry, 213 So.2d at 27, said Tharp held that:. . . to constitute a taking, the flooding need not completely de......
-
Drake v. Smith
...the sovereign's immunity against actions seeking to establish liability other than in tort. See State ex rel. Division of Administration v. Oliff, 350 So.2d 484 (Fla.App.1977); In re Opinion to the Senate, 108 R.I. 302, 275 A.2d 256 (1971).4 This text states:"Section 234(c) of Pub.L. 90-248......
-
Windham v. Florida Dept. of Transp.
...that the trial court erroneously interpreted Section 768.30, Florida Statutes (1981), and miscontrued State ex rel Division of Administration v. Oliff, 350 So.2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), in determining that their cause of action arose in 1959 when the roadwork which allegedly precipitated t......
-
Kempfer v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.
...(Fla. 3rd DCA 1984); Lund v. Cook, 354 So.2d 940 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1978); State ex rel. Div. of Admin. v. Oliff, 350 So.2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); 35 Fla.Jur.2d, Limitations and Laches § 39 (1982). This is analogous to the tolling of the statute of limitatio......