State ex rel. Doud v. Lesueur

Decision Date15 December 1896
Citation38 S.W. 325,136 Mo. 452
PartiesThe State ex rel. Doud et al. v. Lesueur
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Writ denied.

Upton M. Young for relator.

R. F Walker, attorney general, and R. L. McLaran for respondent.

Gantt J. Sherwood, Macfarlane, Burgess, and Robinson, JJ., concur in the foregoing opinion. Barclay, J., concurs in refusing the peremptory writ. Brace, C. J., does not sit.

OPINION

In Banc.

Mandamus.

Gantt J.

On the twenty-second day of October, 1896, the relator Doud filed his petition in this court praying for a writ of mandamus directed to the secretary of state commanding and requiring him to accept and file the certificate and petition of nomination of the "so-called" silver party of the state of Missouri under the caption of "Silver Party Ticket," and to cause it to be printed and placed on the official ballot, duly certified, together with the other candidates to be voted for on November 3, 1896, at the general election to be held on said day.

Relator alleged that on the thirteenth day of October, 1896, he presented a petition of nomination of certain candidates as the candidates of the "silver party" for the various state offices and for presidential electors, duly signed and acknowledged by eleven hundred and sixty-six qualified voters of the state of Missouri to the respondent, secretary of state, and requested him to file the same and place said candidates on the official ballot under the caption of "Silver Party" but the respondent refused to file or recognize the said nominees and place them on said ballot.

In his return to the alternative writ the secretary of state traversed the allegations of the writ; denied that the petition was signed, acknowledged and certified as the law requires; that ninety-four of the names now appearing on said petition were not signed to the petition to which they are now attached but were appended to another and different petition, and have since been detached therefrom and attached to the petition now presented to the court, and that the petition presented to respondent did not contain the requisite number of qualified electors duly acknowledged and certified; that said petition for the nomination of Hon. James S. Botsford, for judge of the Kansas City court of appeals was signed by residents and citizens of that portion of the state over which the St. Louis court of appeals has jurisdiction, and that said petition for the nomination of Hon. R. E. Rombauer, the republican nominee for judge of the St. Louis court of appeals, was signed by citizens of the state living wholly within the territorial jurisdiction of the Kansas City court of appeals.

He further alleged that the caption "Free Silver Party" was fraudulent, misleading, and contrary to and in violation of section 4773, Revised Statutes, 1889, that said caption was calculated to mislead and deceive the electors, in this, that said ticket contained the names of democratic and populist electors nominated both at large and from the various congressional districts in the state, and also contained the nominees of the republican state convention for the various state offices to be filled at said election on November 3, 1896; that said ticket contains the names of the republican nominees for judge of the two courts of appeals; that said nominees of the republican party were nominated and selected upon a platform in direct contravention of the position and policy of the "silver party" as set forth in the caption of said petition, presented to respondent for filing and certification; that if certified on the official ballot the electors of the state would be misled thereby and fraudulently induced to vote for "gold standard" candidates.

Depositions were taken and stipulations filed as to evidence and the cause heard and argued on the twenty-sixth day of October and the peremptory writ was denied. The urgency of the case was such that the court considered it at once, but owing to the pending call of the docket was unable to hand down a written opinion at the time.

It appeared in proof that prior to September 26, 1896, the relator Doud and others in concert with him conceived the idea that they could greatly enhance the chances of Mr. Lewis, the republican nominee for governor, by having what was known as a "silver party" ticket placed upon the official ballot. That ticket was to be headed by the democratic electors, to be followed by all the republican nominees for state offices. With this purpose in view, inasmuch as there was no party known by that name in Missouri and no such party had cast three per cent of the votes at the last general election, resort was had to a certificate of nomination by electors as permitted by section 4763, Revised Statutes, 1889.

This petition was circulated and ninety-two persons appear to have signed the same prior to September 26. That petition contained the following caption:

"Silver Party Ticket.

"To Hon. A. A. Lesueur, Secretary of State, Jefferson City, Mo.

"The undersigned electors of the state of Missouri, residents of the county of therein, pursuant to the election laws of said state, do hereby certify that the persons hereinafter named for nomination are the candidates of the national silver party (which has declared in favor of a distinctly American financial system; and unalterably opposed to the single gold standard; and demand the immediate return to the constitutional standard of gold and silver, by the restoration by this government, independently of any foreign power, of the unrestricted coinage of both gold and silver into standard money at the ratio of sixteen to one, and on terms of exact equality as they existed prior to 1873; the silver coin to be of full legal tender equally with gold for all debts and dues, public and private; and demand such legislation as will prevent for the future the distinction of the legal tender quality of any kind of money by private contract) for the offices set opposite their respective names herein, to be voted for at the ensuing general election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 1896, to wit:

OFFICE.

NAME.

RESIDENCE.

OCCUPA-

TION.

For president, William J. Bryan, of Nebraska.

For vice-president, Arthur Sewall, of Maine.

For presidential electors, the same nominees as will appear on the demo-

cratic ticket.

Governor

Robert E. Lewis

Clinton, Mo

Lawyer.

Lieut. Governor

Abra C. Pettijohn

Brookfield, Mo

Physician.

Secretary of State

William S. Freeman

Tuscumbia, Mo

Lawyer.

State Auditor

John G. Bishop

Kansas City, Mo

Auditor.

State Treasurer

Jacob F. Gmelich

Boonville, Mo

Banker.

Attorney General

John Kennish

Mound City, Mo

Lawyer.

Railroad and Ware-

house Commissioner

George H. Stille

Unionville, Mo

Editor.

Judge of the Supreme

Court

Rudolph Hirzel

Clayton, Mo.

Lawyer.

Judge of the St. Louis

Court of Appeals

Roderick E. Rom-

bauer

St. Louis, Mo

Lawyer.

Judge of the Kansas

City Court of Ap-

peals

James S. Botsford

Kansas City, Mo

Lawyer."

It further appears in evidence that the democratic presidential electors were nominated at a state convention held at the city of Jefferson on the fifth day of August and among others John A. Lee, W. T. Jenkins, James E. Hazell and W. N. Evans were chosen by said convention, that afterward said last named four electors resigned from said ticket and the vacancies so created were filled by the democratic state central committee by the appointment of Thomas B. Anderson, James J. Shoecraft, Arcus L. Douglass, and Simeon A. Handy, who had previously been nominated by the state populist convention at Sedalia.

The petition presented to the secretary of state contained the following caption:

"Silver Party Ticket.

"To Hon. A. A. Lesueur, Secretary of State, Jefferson City, Missouri.

"The undersigned electors of the state of Missouri, residents of the city of St. Louis therein, pursuant to the election laws of said state, do hereby certify that the persons hereinafter named for nomination are the candidates of the national silver party (which has declared in favor of a distinctly American financial system; and unalterably opposed to the single gold standard; and demand the immediate return to the constitutional standard of gold and silver, by the restoration by this government, independently of any foreign power, of the unrestricted coinage of both gold and silver into standard money at the ratio of sixteen to one, and upon terms of exact equality as they existed prior to 1873; the silver coin to be of full legal tender equally with gold for all debts and dues, public and private; and demand such legislation as will prevent for the future the distinction of the legal tender quality of any kind of money by private contract) for the offices set opposite their respective names herein, to be voted for at the ensuing general election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 1896, to wit:

OFFICE.

NAME.

RESIDENCE.

OCCUPATION.

President

William J. Bryan

Lincoln, Neb.

Lawyer.

Vice-President

Arthur Sewall

Bath, Maine

Shipbuilder.

Presidential Electors

At Large

Dewitt C. Allen

Liberty, Mo

Lawyer.

At Large

Thomas B. Anderson

Sedalia, Mo

Jeweler.

District 1

Christopher C. Fogle

Lancaster, Mo

Lawyer.

District 2

Gideon F. Rothwell

Moberly, Mo

District 3

William D. Hamilton

Gallatin, Mo

Lawyer.

District 4

James J. Shoecraft

Tarkio, Mo

Farmer.

District 5

Wiley O. Cox

Kansas City, Mo

Banker.

District 6

Clement C. Dickin-

son

Clinton, Mo

Lawyer.

District 7

Charles J. Wilkins

Morrisville, Mo

Teacher.

District 8

Albert L. Douglass

Clarksburg, Mo

Blacksmith.

District 9

Thomas Cunning-

ham

St. Charles, Mo

Lawyer.

District 10

William G. Frye

St. Louis, Mo

Sec'y Mfg.Co

District 11

Felix Gunn

St. Louis, Mo...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State ex rel. Howe v. Hughes
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1938
    ... ... Snyder v. Newman, 3 S.W. 849, 91 Mo ... 451; State ex rel. Thomas v. Williams, 12 S.W. 905, ... 99 Mo. 303; State ex rel. v. Lesueur, 38 S.W. 325, ... 136 Mo. 459; Ex parte Ashcraft, 193 Mo.App. 488, 186 S.W ... 533; State ex rel. v. Stone, 190 S.W. 601, 269 Mo ... 343. (a) ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT