State ex rel. Ellis v. Brown
Decision Date | 17 October 1930 |
Citation | 33 S.W.2d 109,326 Mo. 637 |
Parties | The State ex rel. Edgar C. Ellis v. Darius A. Brown, Judge of Circuit Court |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Writ quashed.
Louis A. Laughlin, Raymond G. Barnett, W. B. Brown and Samuel A. Dew for relator.
As to the points and authorities, brief and argument in behalf of relator, the court is respectfully referred to the brief of relator in State ex rel. Ellis v. Brown, which brief, it has been stipulated by the parties and counsel, may apply to and be considered in both said causes.
Chet A. Keyes for respondent.
(1) A denial of registration is a denial of the right to vote. Sec 5, Art. VIII. Mo. Constitution, as amended in 1924. (2) The statutes give the right of appeal to every voter who is denied registration by the board of election commissioners and such statutes in no way limit the inquiry of the court nor limit the jurisdiction of the court to order registration of a voter who has the qualifications prescribed by the Constitution. Sec. 33, Laws 1921, p. 353; State ex rel Meyer v. Woodbury, 10 S.W.2d 524; County Court v. Sparks, 10 Mo. 118; Welch v. Williams, 96 Cal. 365; People ex rel. Johnson v. Earl, 94 P. 298; State ex inf. v. Lamar, 316 Mo. 721; Sanders v. Lacks, 142 Mo. 263; Bowers v. Smith, 111 Mo. 61; State ex rel. v. Hackman, 273 Mo. 670; State ex inf. v. Bird, 295 Mo. 344.
Certiorari. Relator states the case as follows
The opinion which is to follow should be read in connection with the one handed down in State ex rel. Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627, 33 S.W.2d 104, a companion case, decided at this term. That this is also a "made case" is readily discernible from the unnecessary formalities so carefully observed "in taking the appeal" from the order of the board of election commissioners. However, it is not a moot case; it is entitled to the consideration that the importance of the question presented demands.
The controlling statute is as follows:
"Whenever any person who has been duly registered as a voter by the board of registration of the precinct in which he then resides, and whose name shall have been returned on the registration list as a voter by the board of registration to the board of election commissioners, after the close of registration shall change his residence from one precinct in said city to another, or from one part of such precinct to another part thereof, before the day of election next following his registration, and shall after making such change at any time on or before the tenth day preceding such election, apply to the board of election commissioners to have his name transferred from the precinct in which he is registered, or his residence changed from his former to his present residence in such precinct, said board shall cause him to be sworn and examined as to the facts of such change, and his statement shall be taken down in writing and signed and sworn to by him and duly certified by said board; if said board shall be satisfied that the applicant has changed his residence, as stated, and that he is entitled to have his name transferred and his place of residence changed, they shall first cause his name, where he moved from his former precinct, to be erased from the registry thereof, and transferred to the precinct in which he then resides, or if he has changed his residence from one place to another in said precinct they shall change his address on the register of such precinct, and note in the column of 'remarks' the precinct to which the transfer is made." [Sec. 29, Laws 1921 (2d Ex. Sess.), p. 29.]
It is the contention of relator that this statute is mandatory in respect to its provision that a registered voter who changes his residence after the close of registration shall apply to the Board of Election Commissioners, on or before the tenth day preceding the election, to have his name transferred from the precinct in which he is registered to the one in which he then resides. If it is to be so construed, then it disfranchises all voters who change their residence within the period of ten days next before an election.
The Constitution provides that "all citizens of the United States . . . over the age of twenty-one years who have resided in this State one year, and in the county, city or town sixty days immediately preceding the election at which they offer to vote . . . shall be entitled to vote at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Woodmansee v. Ridge
...123 S.W.2d 20 343 Mo. 702 State of Missouri at the relation of J. E. Woodmansee, Bruce Forrester, Edgar Shook and Lewis Ellis, as Members of and composing the Board of Election Commissioners for Kansas City and also as citizens and qualified and duly registered voters of the ... v. Mo ... Workmen's Comp. Comm., 320 Mo. 893, 8 S.W.2d 899; 5 ... R. C. L., p. 255, sec. 7; State ex rel. Ellis v ... Brown, 326 Mo. 635, 33 S.W.2d 109; State ex rel ... Meyer v. Woodbury, 326 Mo. 275, 10 S.W.2d 524; State ... ex rel. Faust v. Thomas, 313 Mo. 160, 282 ... ...
-
City of Maryville v. Wood
... ... Constitution of the State of Missouri, and the trial court ... erred in not holding said ordinance unconstitutional. Secs ... 4891-4892, R.S. 1939 as amended; State ex rel. Knise v ... Kinsey, 314 Mo. 80, 282 S.W. 437; Sec. 4908, R.S. 1939; ... the English Language; Sec. 4881, R.S. 1939; State ex rel ... Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 637, 33 S.W.2d 109; De ... Jarnett v. Tickameyer, 328 ... ...
-
State ex rel. Barrett v. Sartorious
... ... the St. Louis Court of Appeals: State ex rel. Woodmansee ... v. Ridge, 343 Mo. 702, 123 S.W.2d 20; State ex rel ... Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627, 33 S.W.2d 104; State ex ... rel. Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 637, 33 S.W.2d 109; ... State ex rel. Hay v. Flynn, 235 ... ...
- State ex rel. Ellis v. Brown