State ex rel. Ferris v. Industrial Commission

Decision Date05 March 1969
Citation245 N.E.2d 357,17 Ohio St.2d 49
Parties, 46 O.O.2d 266 The STATE ex rel. FERRIS, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Ohio, Appellee, et al.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Harold Ticktin, Cleveland, for appellant.

Paul W. Brown, Atty. Gen., Walter J. Howdyshell and Robert J. Dodd, Jr., Columbus, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This action in mandamus originated in the Court of Appeals which dismissed it on the ground that relator had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law.

In this action, relator seeks to have set aside a decision of the Administrator of the Bureau of Workmen's Compensation in an injury case ordering that no further compensation be awarded to relator. This decision was not a decision as to the extent of disability.

Thus, Sections 4123.516 and 4123.519, Revised Code, provide relator with administrative and court appeals from the decision which he seeks to have set aside in this mandamus action. Paragraph one of the syllabus of State ex rel. Benton v. Columbus & S. O. Elec. Co. (1968), 14 Ohio St.2d 130, 237 N.E.2d 134, and paragraph three of the syllabus of State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, required an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

TAFT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, SCHNEIDER, COLE, and DUNCAN, JJ., concur.

COLE, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting for HERBERT, J.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • DiFederico v. Reed
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • April 15, 1969
  • State ex rel. Mansour v. Industrial Commission
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • July 9, 1969
    ...preserve the extraordinary remedy of mandamus as well as to require utilization of the statutory appeal. See State ex rel. Ferris v. Indus. Comm., 17 Ohio St.2d 49, 245 N.E.2d 357; State ex rel. Foley v. Greyhound Lines, 16 Ohio St.2d 6, 241 N.E.2d 904; State ex rel. Latino v. Indus. Comm.,......
  • Pallini v. Dankowski
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1969
  • State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1975
    ...an appeal is available from an order of the commission, an action in mandamus may not be maintained. See State ex rel. Ferris v. Indus. Comm. (1969), 17 Ohio St.2d 49, 245 N.E.2d 357; State ex rel. Foley v. Greyhound Lines (1968), 16 Ohio St.2d 6, 241 N.E.2d 904; State ex rel. Benton v. C. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT