State ex rel. Gass v. Gordon
Citation | 181 S.W. 1016,266 Mo. 394 |
Parties | THE STATE ex rel. HOWARD A. GASS, State Superintendent of Public Schools, v. JOHN P. GORDON, State Auditor |
Decision Date | 22 December 1915 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
A. T Dumm for relator.
(1) The terms "ordinary revenue," as used in section 6 of article 11 of the Constitution of 1875 and in the Appropriation Act of 1915 (Laws 1915, p. 89), and "State revenue," as used in section 7 of article 11 of the Constitution, are synonymous, and include all receipts into the State Treasury to the credit of the revenue fund. Secs. 6 and 7, art. 11, Constitution 1875; Laws 1915, p. 89; Laws 1895, p. 18; 34 Cyc. 1691; United States v. Bromley, 12 How. (U.S.) 97; Bates v. Porter, 74 Cal. 224; People ex rel. v. Supervisors, 4 Hill (N. Y.), 23; People v. Railroad, 34 Barb. (N. Y.) 134; Iverson Brown's Case, 91 Va. 779; State ex rel. v. School Fund, 4 Kan. 268; Commonwealth v. Bailey, 3 Ky L. R. 117; Brown v. Elder, 32 Colo. 535; United States v. Mayo, 1 Gall. 396; State v. Ewing, 22 Kan. 708; Donelson v. State, 3 Lea (Tenn.), 695; Yancey v. Mfg. Co., 33 Ga. 624; Lamar W. & E. L Co. v. Lamar, 128 Mo. 202. (2) Section 7 of article 11 of the Constitution of 1875 is a mandate to the Legislature to appropriate not less than twenty-five per cent of the State revenue, exclusive of the interest and sinking fund, to be applied annually to the support of the public schools. And the exclusion of the "interest and sinking fund" is the inclusion of all other receipts into the treasury to the credit of the revenue fund.
Robert Burkham, Attorney for the Board of Education of the City of St. Louis; Gage, Ladd & Small, Attorneys for the School District of Kansas City; H. K. White, Attorney for the School District of the City of St. Joseph; Ed. D. Merritt, Attorney for the School District of Springfield; Kelsey & Cameron Attorneys for the School District of Joplin; Mahan, Smith & Mahan, Attorneys for the School District of Hannibal; Charles E. Yeater, Attorney for the School District of Sedalia; A. G. Young, Attorney for the School District of Webb City; and Arthur B. Chamier, Attorney for the School District of Moberly, Amici Curiae.
(1) The expression "ordinary revenue" employed in the Act of 1915 is necessarily equivalent to the expression "State revenue" as used in article 11, section 7, of the Constitution. (2) "State revenue" includes inspection fees and the like whether this expression be considered, 1st, independently: State ex rel. v. Ewing, 22 Kan. 708; United States v. Bromley, 12 How. (U.S.) 88; Van Sant v. Stage Co., 59 Md. 330; Power & Conduit Co. v. Buffalo, 131 A.D. 485; or, 2nd, in connection with the context: Art. 11, secs. 6, 8, Constitution.
OPINIONIn Banc.
Mandamus.
For judgment see opinion, page 422.
-- This is an original proceeding by mandamus, brought by relator as State Superintendent of Public Schools, to compel respondent, as State Auditor, to set apart and certify for payment to the relator for the use of the public schools of the State, the sum of $ 496,587.34, under the Act of February 12, 1915 (Laws 1915, p. 89), which required the State Auditor to ascertain and set apart one-third of the ordinary revenue for the support of the public schools.
The case is here upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts. The pleadings are conventional, and since no point is made touching them, we need not cumber the books with them. The agreed statement of facts, which we apprehend will be found sufficient to convey an understanding of the conditions and issues, runs thus:
"It is agreed that during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1915, there were paid into the State Treasury to the credit of the General Revenue Fund, the following sums from the different sources mentioned:
1.
From county collectors (tax on real and per-
sonal property)
$ 3,851,174 61
2.
County foreign insurance tax
365,449 17
3.
Private car tax
9,870 90
4.
Express companies' tax
44,737 68
5.
Notaries' commissions
12,336 00
6.
Land Department fees
556 22
7.
Fees earned in office of State Auditor
8,380 88
8.
Fees earned by office of Secretary of State
9,719 30
9.
Incorporation tax (fees paid by corporations
upon their incorporation and upon their in-
crease of capital stock)
87,017 50
10.
Fees from Excise Commissioner of city of St.
Louis
42,462 00
11.
Proceeds of sale of beer stamps
460,858 27
12.
Interest received from State depositaries
147,223 35
13.
Sale of oil stamps (being fees from oil inspec-
tions)
150,466 80
14.
Interest on deposit of fees by St. Louis Excise
Commissioner
15.
Interest on deposit of Fish Commission
16.
Excess fees from clerk of Supreme Court, clerk
of St. Louis Court of Appeals, clerk of Spring-
field Court of Appeals, clerk of Kansas City
Court of Appeals
3,573 62
17.
Fees collected by Excise Commissioners of St.
Louis county
3,713 02
18.
Receipts from sale of laws
2,018 50
19.
Receipts from old bond and coupon account
15,270 43
20.
Receipts from amounts refunded
36,032 06
21.
Receipts from fines assessed against lumber
companies for violation of Anti-Trust Act
252,728 65
22.
Receipts from fees of Poultry Experiment Sta-
tion
5,280 96
23.
Receipts from fees of Warehouse and Grain
Department
127,123 37
24.
Moneys earned by State Auditors' Examiners
6,702 08
25.
Receipts from insurance on Federal Soldiers'
Home
2,308 92
26.
Receipts from sale of old furniture
165 00
27.
Receipts for Itinerant Vendors Licenses
28.
Receipts from fees of Bureau of Labor
2 07
29.
Receipts from fees of Board of Agriculture
30.
Receipts from fees of Fruit Experiment Station
299 72
31.
Receipts from Fish Commissioner's refund
301 05
32.
Transferred from Insurance Department Fund
125,000 00
33.
Transferred from Factory Inspection Fund
6,271 93
34.
Transferred from Text-Book Fund
990 00
35.
And it is agreed that the relator's petition be taken and regarded as amended by striking...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Hanlon v. City of Maplewood
... ... prescribing the duties of officers of such cities, are ... charged with the responsibilty of the government thereof ... [ State ex rel. Gass v. Gordon, 266 Mo. 394, 412, 181 ... S.W. 1016, 1021.] ... Looking ... at the entire subject-matter covered by the various ... ...
-
The State ex rel. International Shoe Company v. Chapman
... ... determining its true meaning. State ex rel. v ... Davis, 273 Mo. 660; State ex rel. v. Gordon, ... 266 Mo. 394. (4) The rule is well established that when a ... Statute exercises its legitimate and rightful power to tax an ... occupation ... ...
-
State ex rel. Williams v. Buzard
... ... College, 257 Mo. 541; Darlington Lbr. Co. v ... Railroad, 216 Mo. 658; State ex rel. Taylor v ... Daues, 313 Mo. 200; State ex rel. Gass v ... Gordon, 266 Mo. 394; State ex rel. Emmons v ... Farmer, 271 Mo. 306; Bassen v. Monckton, 308 ... Mo. 641; State v. Irvine, 335 Mo. 261, 72 ... ...
-
Laclede Power & Light Co. v. City of St. Louis
... ... Neither the ... Constitution nor the laws of the state forbid reasonable ... classification for the purpose of taxation, and ... v. Wollbrinck, 275 Mo. 339, ... 205 S.W. 196; State ex rel. v. Blaine, 332 Mo. 582, ... 58 S.W.2d 975; Welch v. Henry, 223 Wis ... received from taxes. Gass v. Gordon, 266 Mo. 394, ... 181 S.W. 1016. (6) A classification for ... ...