State ex rel. Gibson v. Industrial Com'n of Ohio

Citation39 Ohio St.3d 319,530 N.E.2d 916
Decision Date16 November 1988
Docket NumberNo. 87-634,87-634
PartiesThe STATE ex rel. GIBSON, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO et al., Appellees.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Appellant, Ruby M. Gibson, was injured on April 28, 1978, while in the course of and arising out of her employment with appellee Jeep Corporation. The claim was allowed for "[b]ursitis of right shoulder," and temporary total compensation was awarded through January 30, 1979. Between 1980 and 1983, appellant filed several motions for temporary total compensation, all of which were denied at the administrative level.

On November 4, 1983, appellant moved that her condition for "frozen right shoulder with periarthritis" be recognized as part of her claim. She also requested temporary total compensation retroactive to November 4, 1981, and to continue upon submission of medical proof based on the newly requested condition. On January 31, 1984, a district hearing officer granted the additional allowance, but denied temporary total compensation, finding that the condition did not prevent appellant from returning to her former position of employment.

On appeal to the regional board of review, the order was modified and temporary total compensation was awarded from November 4, 1983. Dissatisfied with the board's failure to grant temporary total compensation retroactive to 1981, appellant, pursuant to R.C. 4123.516, again appealed. The ensuing order read in pertinent part:

"It is the finding of the Staff Hearing Officers that claimant's appeal be denied. That the order of the Regional Board dated 5-7-84 be modified to the extent that the Staff Hearing Officers find claimant's disability to be permanent in nature based on the Staff Hearing Officer order dated 3-30-83, and the fact that the additional condition described as 'frozen right shoulder with periarthritis' was initially diagnosed in July of 1978 per Dr. Shiple.

"Therefore, the temporary total from 11-4-81 through 11-3-83 is denied and temporary total from 11-4-83 to continue is vacated and denied. The Staff Hearing Officers find that there is jurisdiction to vacate temporary total beginning 11-4-1983 even without an employer's appeal as the claimant's appeal cannot be limited and opens for consideration all issues ruled upon in the order being appealed.

"The order of the Regional Board is affirmed in all respects."

Appellant filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, alleging that the commission abused its discretion in vacating the regional board's award of temporary total compensation because the commission had no jurisdiction to consider the award. The court of appeals denied the writ.

The cause is now before this court upon an appeal as a matter of right.

Gallon,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
44 cases
  • Black v. Hicks
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • August 6, 2020
    ...on appeal. State ex rel. Zollner v. Indus. Comm. , 66 Ohio St.3d 276, 278, 611 N.E.2d 830 (1993), citing State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm. , 39 Ohio St.3d 319, 530 N.E.2d 916 (1988). {¶ 80} " ‘ "[A]n appellate court will not consider any error which counsel for a party complaining of the......
  • Lewis v. Trimble
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • July 23, 1997
    ...the requisite minimum number of employees, and the status of the employer as self-insuring. In State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 319, 320, 530 N.E.2d 916, 917, the court held: "[Claimant's] sole proposition before this court is that the commission's assumption of ju......
  • State v. Oliver
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • May 9, 2023
    ... 2023-Ohio-1550 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ja'Braelin ... See, e.g., State ex ... rel. Zollner v. Indus. Comm. , 66 Ohio St.3d 276, 278 ... 3), citing State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm. , ... 39 Ohio St.3d 319 (1988) ("A party ... ...
  • State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Foreman
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1997
    ...Indus. Comm. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 241, 25 O.O. 362, 47 N.E.2d 767, paragraph three of the syllabus; State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 319, 320, 530 N.E.2d 916, 917 (rule that issues not previously raised are waived is applicable in an appeal from a denial of a writ ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT