State ex rel. Grissom v. McGookey, 2005-1889.
Decision Date | 12 April 2006 |
Docket Number | No. 2005-1889.,2005-1889. |
Citation | 108 Ohio St.3d 491,844 N.E.2d 841,2006 Ohio 1506 |
Parties | The STATE ex rel. GRISSOM, Appellant, v. McGOOKEY, Judge, Appellee. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Artie Grissom, pro se.
Kevin J. Baxter, Erie County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mary Ann Barylski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel a trial court judge to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on the denial of a petition for postconviction relief.
{¶ 2} In July 2005, appellant, Artie Grissom, filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Erie County for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Erie County Common Pleas Court Judge Beverly K. McGookey, to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to her August 23, 2004 denial of Grissom's petition for postconviction relief.
{¶ 3} In August 2005, the court of appeals dismissed the petition.
{¶ 4} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. As the court of appeals held, Grissom's failure to comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.25 justified dismissal. State ex rel. Hawk v. Athens Cty., 106 Ohio St.3d 183, 2005-Ohio-4383, 833 N.E.2d 296, ¶ 5.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Newell, 2007 Ohio 400 (Ohio App. 1/30/2007), 89016.
...the balance of his prison account, as verified by the institutional cashier, for each of the preceding six months. State ex rel. Grissom v. McGookey, 108 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-1506, 844 N.E.2d 841; State ex rel. Pamer v. Collier, 108 Ohio St.3d 492, 2006-Ohio-1507, 844 N.E.2d 842; State......
-
State ex rel. Dooley v. Trial Court, 2007 Ohio 291 (Ohio App. 1/23/2007)
...the balance of his prison account, as verified by the institutional cashier, for each of the preceding six months. State ex rel. Grissom v. McGookey, 108 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-1506, 844 N.E.2d 841; State ex rel. Pamer v. Collier, 108 Ohio St.3d 492, 2006-Ohio-1507, 844 N.E.2d 842; State......
-
State ex rel. Wickensimer v. Bartleson
...2} A failure to comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.25 justifies dismissal of an extraordinary-writ action. State ex rel. Grissom v. McGookey, 108 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-1506, 844 N.E.2d 841, ¶ 4. R.C. 2969.25(A) requires that "[a]t the time that an inmate commences a civil action ......