State ex rel. Hahn v. Young
Decision Date | 09 September 1881 |
Parties | State of Minnesota ex rel. William J. Hahn, Attorney General, v. Austin H. Young and others |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
By an act approved March 3, 1857, (11 U.S. St. at Large, 195,) congress granted to the then territory of Minnesota, to aid in the construction of six lines of railroad on routes designated in the act, six sections of land per mile, in alternate sections, along the lines of such roads as they should thereafter be located. By an act approved May 23 1857, (Laws 1857, Ex. Sess. c. 1,) the territory bestowed these grants on the Southern Minnesota Railroad Co., the Transit Railroad Co., the Minneapolis & Cedar Valley Railroad Co., and the Minnesota & Pacific Railroad Co. By act of congress of February 23, 1857, (11 U.S. St. at Large, 166,) the people of the territory had been authorized to form a constitution and state government, with a view to admission into the Union, and on October 13, 1857, a constitution was adopted, containing the following provisions, in article 9:
The financial depression occurring in the autumn of 1857 made it impossible for the land-grant companies to obtain money to build their roads, and on March 9, 1858, the first legislature elected under the constitution, passed an act proposing an amendment to section 10 of article 9 of the constitution, which was submitted to the people on April 15 1858, and adopted, the vote being 25,023 in favor of, and 6,733 against, the proposed amendment. As thus amended, this section read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Red River Valley Brick Co. v. City of Grand Forks
...... authorize an injunction. State R. Tax Cases, 92 U.S. 575, 23. L.Ed. 669; Arkansas Bldg. & L. Asso. v. ...Co. v. Dickey. County, 11 N.D. 107, 90 N.W. 260; Schaffner v. Young, 10 N.D. 245, 86 N.W. 733; St. Anthony & D. Elevator Co. v. Bottineau ...Quo warranto was. their proper remedy. State ex rel. Fletcher v. Osburn, 24 Nev. 187, 51 P. 839; State ex rel. Anderson v. ... 744, 73 A. 560, 18 Ann. Cas. 484; State ex rel. Hahn v. Young, 29 Minn. 474, 9 N.W. 737; State ex rel. Luley. v. Simons, ......
-
Wagoner v. Wagoner
...... res adjudicata of its invalidity. (9) "The courts of the. state of the domicile of the parties doubtless have. jurisdiction to decree a ...21;. Black's Constitutional Law, sec. 105, p. 279; State. v. Young, 29 Minn. 474; Cooley on Constitutional. Limitations, sec. 116. (e) The ... here. Starbuck v. Starbuck, 173 N.Y. 503; State. ex rel. v. Holtkamp, 266 Mo. 366; Coleman v. Farrar, 122 Mo. 54; Boogher v. ......
-
State ex rel. Patterson v. Board of County Commissioners of Douglas County
......160; Smith. v. Strother, 68 Cal. 194; People v. Bennett, 29. Mich. 451; Shephard v. City of Wheeling, 30 W.Va. 479; Minnesota v. Young, 29 Minn. 474; State v. Kennon, 7 Ohio St. 561; State v. Barbour, 53. Conn. 76; Taylor v. Commonwealth, 3 J. J. Marsh. [Ky.] 401; Hayburn's ......
-
The State ex rel. Buckner v. McElroy
...rel. v. Brill, 100 Minn. 499; In re Elec. Suprs., 114 Mass. 247, 19 Am. Rep. 341; Ashley v. Wait, 8 A. L. R. 1468, 228 Mass. 63; State v. Young, 29 Minn. 474; Houseman Kent, 58 Mich. 364; Schwarz v. Dover, 68 N. J. L. 576; State v. Barker, 116 Iowa 96, 57 L. R. A. 244; County v. Mitchell, 9......