State ex rel. Haywood v. Superintendent, Davidson County Workhouse
Decision Date | 06 March 1953 |
Citation | 195 Tenn. 265,31 Beeler 265,259 S.W.2d 159 |
Parties | , 195 Tenn. 265 STATE ex rel. HAYWOOD v. SUPERINTENDENT, DAVIDSON COUNTY WORKHOUSE. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Z. T. Osborn, Jr., City Atty., Benson Trimble, Asst. City Atty., Nashville, for appellant.
Z. Alexander Looby, Nashville, for appellee.
The relator filed a petition for the writ of habeas corpus, seeking his discharge from the custody of the Superintendent of the Davidson County Workhouse upon the ground that the order committing and sentencing him to the said penal institution for 11 months and 29 days is void, the penalty being imposed by the Judge of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. It is alleged in the petition Article 51 of Chapter 246 of the Private Acts of 1947 (Charter of the City of Nashville) which provided for a 'Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court' is in violation of Article 6, section 1, of the Constitution of Tennessee.
Contention is made by the relator that the aforesaid provision of the Act is repugnant to the constitution for three reasons:
(1) 'It delegates to the Mayor and City Council the power and duty to establish a Court '* * * all of the powers and jurisdiction conferred upon Juvenile Courts by law.'
(2) 'It denies the people of the district or circuit in which the Court operates the right to elect the Judge.
(3) 'It limits the choice of the people by imposing certain requirements not prescribed by the State constitution.'
The trial judge sustained the petition and entered an order discharging the relator from custody, from which order defendant appealed and assigned the following errors:
(1) 'The Trial Court erred in permitting the constitutionality of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court in Nashville and Article 51 of Chapter 246 of the Private Acts of 1947 to be collaterally attacked in a habeas corpus proceedings as to its constitutionality.
(2) 'The Trial Court erred in holding that Article 51 of Chapter 246 of the Private Acts of 1947 was unconstitutional in that it violated Article 6, sections 1 and 4 of the Constitution of the State of Tennessee, said Act being constitutional in all respects.'
Article 51 provides 'That the Mayor and City Council shall by ordinance provide for a Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court.
Other sections provide that the court is vested with jurisdiction to 'try and determine and render final judgment in all misdemeanor cases brought before said Court by warrant charging a violation of Section 11370 of the Code', the same being a misdemeanor for any husband wilfully and without good cause to neglect or fail to provide for his wife according to his means, or leaves her destitute, etc., and for the neglect of children. Code § 11379.
Article 6, § 1 of the Constitution reads as follows:
Article 6, § 4, of the Constitution provides:
We readily agree with the insistence that the Legislature may establish, as a part of the governmental machinery of a municipality, 'a corporation court' with limited jurisdiction and which would not be a delegation of judicial power within the meaning of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Summers v. Thompson
...powers of a judge of an inferior court within the meaning of Article VI, Sec. 1. See State ex rel. Haywood v. Superintendent, Davidson County Workhouse, 195 Tenn. 265, 270-271, 259 S.W.2d 159, 161 (1953). 5 We now turn to the proper construction of the statutes at T.C.A. Sec. 6-21-501 has t......
-
Person v. The Board of Commissioners of Shelby County, No. W2007-01346-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. App. 9/28/2009)
...Assembly to a local government such delegation is in "plain violation of the Constitution of Tennessee." Haywood v. Davidson County Workhouse, 259 S.W.2d 159, 162 (Tenn. 1953), overruled on other grounds, Bankston v. State, 908 S.W.2d 194 (Tenn. 1985); Ellis v. State, 20 S.W. 500, 502 (Tenn......
-
Waters v. State ex rel. Schmutzer
...the requirements of Article VI, Section 4. Stambaugh v. Price, Tenn., 532 S.W.2d 929 (1976); State ex rel. Haywood v. Superintendent, Davidson County Workhouse, 195 Tenn. 265, 259 S.W.2d 159 (1953). The same is true of the office of judge of the county court. Chambers v. Marcum, 195 Tenn. 1......
-
Bankston v. State
...in all cases of violation of the criminal laws of the state." We then reasoned, citing State ex rel. Haywood v. Superintendent, Davidson County Workhouse, 195 Tenn. 265, 259 S.W.2d 159 (1953), that the municipal ordinance and § 6-2-403 conflicted with Art. VI, § 4 of the Tennessee Constitut......