State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Decision Date10 January 1996
Docket NumberNo. 95-1769,95-1769
PartiesThe STATE ex rel. JERNINGHAN, Appellant, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY et al., Appellees.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

On July 10, 1995, appellant, Tommie Jerninghan, Jr., filed a complaint in mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, alleging that his appeal in case No. CV265857 had been dismissed for lack of a final order, and seeking to compel appellees to file a final order in the case. On July 25, 1995, appellees filed a motion to dismiss the complaint as moot, attaching a copy of an order dismissing case No. CV265857. On July 31, 1995, the court of appeals issued a journal entry dismissing the case.

Appellant appeals to this court as a matter of right.

Tommie Jerninghan, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 6 OBR 4, 450 N.E.2d 1163.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, Sr., PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
283 cases
  • State ex rel. Mackey v. Blackwell, 2004 Ohio 7004 (OH 12/22/2004)
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • December 22, 2004
    ...or that the respondents have violated any enumerated duty as required under R.C. 3503.13. Cf. State ex rel. Jerningham v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163. {¶3} In ......
  • State ex rel. Cox v. Youngstown Civil Serv. Comm'n
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • August 18, 2021
    ...mandamus ordering the commission to issue a decision determining his appeal is moot. See State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas , 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 279, 658 N.E.2d 723 (1996) ("A writ of mandamus will not lie to compel an act already performed").2. Service of the c......
  • State v. Wilson
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • August 6, 2021
    ...to compel an act already performed.'" State ex rel Evans v. Mohr, 155 Ohio St.3d 579, 2018-Ohio-5089, 122 N.E.3d 1240, ¶ 4, quoting Jerninghan at 279. Respondent has issued findings fact and conclusions of law in the criminal case Wilson referenced in his complaint. This was the sole claim ......
  • State ex rel. Municipal Constr. Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of Cleveland, 2004 Ohio 1261 (Ohio App. 3/12/2004), Case No. 83057.
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • March 12, 2004
    ...rendered moot. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163; State ex rel. Jerningham v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 658 N.E.2d 723. {¶10} We must next address the issue of whether the documents provided under seal to this court......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT