State ex rel. Johnston v. Iowa Dept. of Social Services
| Decision Date | 19 January 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 67609,67609 |
| Citation | 328 N.W.2d 912 |
| Parties | STATE of Iowa ex rel. Dan L. JOHNSTON, Polk County Attorney, Appellant, v. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; Michael Reagen, Commissioner of the Iowa Department of Social Services; the Iowa Department of Social Services, Division of Adult Corrections; and Harold A. Farrier, Director of the Iowa Department of Social Services, Division of Adult Corrections, Appellees. |
| Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Thomas M. Werner, Asst. Polk County Atty., for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Atty. Gen., and John G. Black, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Considered by HARRIS, P.J., and McGIVERIN, LARSON, SCHULTZ and CARTER, JJ.
The petitioner in a proceeding for judicial review of administrative agency action appeals from district court's dismissal of the action. The agency action which is challenged relates to the granting of honor time in reduction of a prison sentence imposed on a criminal defendant. The substantive issues on appeal from the final order of the district court concern petitioner's challenge to (1) the district court's conclusion that petitioner lacked standing to seek judicial review of the agency action and (2) the district court's alternative conclusion that in any event, the petition for judicial review was untimely.
Following the submission of the appeal, we directed the parties to file written statements relating to a jurisdictional issue not argued in the briefs of either party. The record reflects that the order of the district court dismissing appellant's petition for judicial review was entered on August 4, 1981, and that notice of appeal was not filed until October 8, 1981. It appears that this notice of appeal is not timely unless a motion to reconsider filed by appellant on August 14, 1981, is considered to be "a motion as provided in R.C.P. 179(b)," for purposes of extending the time of taking appeal under Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(a).
In considering whether a particular motion should be viewed as one authorized by rule 179(b), we have held that except where otherwise authorized by rule or statute, such action may only be addressed to determinations made in trials involving issues of fact without a jury. Kunau v. Miller, 328 N.W.2d 529, 530 (Iowa 1983); City of Eldridge v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 270 N.W.2d 637, 640 (Iowa 1978). In Budde v. City Development Board, 276 N.W.2d 846, 851 (Iowa 1979), we held that where the district court makes no determination of factual issues in reviewing administrative agency action, there is no basis for filing a rule 179(b) motion so as to toll the 30-day appeal period under rule 5(a).
A rule amendment effective July 1, 1980, extended the applicability of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Robco Transp., Inc. v. Ritter
...an appeal not authorized by rule. Qualley v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 261 N.W.2d 466, 468 (Iowa 1978); see State v. Iowa Department of Social Services, 328 N.W.2d 912, 913 (Iowa 1983). A trial court's ruling sustaining a special appearance is a final order from which an appeal of right may be......
-
Sierra Club Iowa Chapter v. Iowa Dep't of Transp.
...of fact). This issue has also been addressed in the realm of judicial review of agency action in State ex rel. Johnston v. Iowa Department of Social Services, 328 N.W.2d 912, 912–13 (Iowa 1983). The court in Johnston held that even though the predecessor of rule 1.1603 provided that the pro......
-
Osborne v. Iowa Natural Resources Council, 68766
...179(b) motions are limited to decisions in which the district court made a determination of fact. State ex rel. Johnston v. Iowa Department of Social Services, 328 N.W.2d 912, 913 (Iowa 1983). Although we have never expressly stated that rule 333(c) extends rule 179(b) motions in administra......
-
Deibler v. Iowa Bd. of Regents
...1.904(2) shall apply.”); Osborne v. Iowa Natural Res. Council, 336 N.W.2d 745, 747 (Iowa 1983) (citing State ex rel. Johnston v. Iowa Dep't of Soc. Servs., 328 N.W.2d 912, 913 (Iowa 1983)) (“[I]n agency adjudication other than a contested case rule, [1.904(2) ] motions are limited to decisi......