State ex rel. Little v. Laurendine
| Decision Date | 04 April 1940 |
| Docket Number | 1 Div. 88. |
| Citation | State ex rel. Little v. Laurendine, 196 So. 278, 239 Ala. 620 (Ala. 1940) |
| Parties | STATE EX REL. LITTLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS, v. LAURENDINE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied June 6, 1940.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Claude A. Grayson, Judge.
Proceeding in equity by the State of Alabama, on the relation of James B. Little, as Superintendent of Banks, liquidating the Peoples Bank of Mobile, to sell certain real estate as a part of the assets of said Bank, wherein P. B. Laurendine intervened and filed a petition opposing the sale and propounding his claim as a creditor of the Bank. From a decree overruling a demurrer to the petition of intervention complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
Outlaw & Seale and Vincent F. Kilborn, all of Mobile, for appellant.
Wm. V McDermott and Harry T. Smith & Caffey, all of Mobile, for appellee.
The averments of the petition of Laurendine, as last amended show the creation of an express trust in the Barrett property ultimately conveyed to the Peoples Bank of Mobile, in consummation of the joint adventure participated in by Laurendine on the one part and the bank through its president on the other to acquire said property, and the petitioner is entitled to participate in the profits arising therefrom after reimbursing the bank for the money advanced, with interest, and other lawful charges against said property, and therefore entitled to an accounting as prayed in said petition.
The demurrer to the petition was therefore properly overruled, and the decree of the circuit court is due to be affirmed.
Affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except THOMAS, J., who dissents.
The liquidator came into possession of an interest in the land in question in the City of Mobile and duly sought to sell the same for $2,500. Laurendine objected to the sale on the grounds of inadequacy of the offer of purchase price, and also prayed for an accounting.
The petition for leave to intervene contained the claim made in July 19, 1927, to the superintendent of banks, which, among other things, averred:
This claim by petitioner was filed pursuant to Sections 6310 and 6312 et seq. of the Code, and fixed the status of Laurendine's cause of action against the bank being liquidated and affecting the properties in question. Cooke v. Little, as Supt., Ala.Sup., 194 So. 853; Jackson v. Whitesell, 213 Ala. 369, 104 So. 662; Williams, Supt., v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 229 Ala. 646, 159 So. 92.
To this petition the demurrer of James B. Little, as Superintendent of Banks, was sustained.
The amended petition, to which demurrer of the Superintendent of Banks was overruled, contained, among other things, the following averments:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting