State ex rel MacDonald v. Ferguson, 32433
| Decision Date | 07 March 1951 |
| Docket Number | No. 32433,32433 |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
| Parties | , 44 O.O. 72 STATE ex rel. MacDONALD et al., d. b. a. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Hall & MacDonald, v. FERGUSON, Aud. |
In Mandamus.
Ed D. Schorr and Charles J. Chastang, Columbus, for relators.
Robert L. Drury, Columbus, for respondent.
Herbert S. Duffy and C. William O'Neill, Attys. Gen., Joseph P. Kinneary, Nelson Lancione and Hugh A. Sherer, all of Columbus, for intervening petitioners.
The facts in this case are substantially the same as those involved in State ex rel. Allen v. Ferguson, Ohio Sup., 97 N.E.2d 660, and the questions of law involved are the same. On the authority of that case, the demurrer to the amended answer of the auditor in the instant case is sustained and the writ prayed for is allowed.
Demurrer to amended answer sustained and writ allowed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Solether v. Ohio Turnpike Commission
...Defenbacher, 153 Ohio St. 268, 91 N.E.2d 512; State ex rel. Allen v. Ferguson, 155 Ohio St. 26, 97 N.E.2d 660; State ex rel. MacDonald v. Ferguson, 155 Ohio St. 46, 97 N.E.2d 671; State ex rel. Ohio Turnpike Commission v. Allen, 158 Ohio St. 168, 107 N.E.2d 345, certiorari denied, Balduff v......
-
State ex rel. Ohio Turnpike Commission v. Allen
...153 Ohio St. 268, 91 N.E.2d 512; State ex rel. Allen v. Ferguson, Aud., 155 Ohio St. 26, 97 N.E.2d 660; and State ex rel. MacDonald v. Ferguson, Aud., 155 Ohio St. 46, 97 N.E.2d 671. Obviously the most serious contention of the respondent is that of the unconstitutionality of the so-called ......
- Macht v. Dutton, 32392