State ex rel. Manos v. Speese

Decision Date09 September 1998
PartiesState ex rel. Manos v. Speese NO. 98-1684
CourtOhio Supreme Court

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed evidence and a brief, due August 27, 1998, in compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(9) and therefore have failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, sua sponte. See State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 182, 685 N.E.2d 507.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State ex rel. Manos v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections, 98-2022
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 21 de outubro de 1998
    ... ... See State ex rel. Manos v. Speese (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 1423, 699 ... N.E.2d 96. By doing so, relators ignored the fact that they had an adequate legal remedy in the form of a written protest to the board, which has authority under R.C. 3501.11(K) and 3501.39 to determine the sufficiency and validity of municipal initiative and ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT