State ex rel. McGee v. Ohio State Bd. of Psychology, 89-1548
Decision Date | 21 February 1990 |
Docket Number | No. 89-1548,89-1548 |
Citation | 49 Ohio St.3d 59,550 N.E.2d 945 |
Parties | The STATE ex rel. McGEE, v. OHIO STATE BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Lane, Alton & Horst, Jeffrey J. Jurca and Sam B. Weiner, Columbus, for relator.
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Lauren M. Ross, Columbus, for respondent.
Solomon M. Fulero, Dayton, for Dr. Cirino.
Ohio's public records statute mandates release of public records, but explicitly excepts "confidential law enforcement investigatory records." R.C. 149.43(A)(2), inter alia, provides:
The State Board of Psychology's investigation of McGee fits within R.C. 149.43(A)(2) as a "confidential law enforcement investigatory record." The reference in R.C. 149.43(A)(2) to four types of law enforcement matters--criminal, quasi-criminal, civil, and administrative--evidences a clear statutory intention to include investigative activities of state licensing boards. See definitions of "agency" and "adjudication" in R.C. 119.01(A) and (D); and 1981 Ohio Atty.Gen.Ops. No. 81-014, at 2-49.
Under Ohio law, the board is charged with licensing and regulating psychologists, with authority to reprimand, or to suspend or revoke their licenses. The board investigates suspected misconduct and rule violations. See R.C. 4732.06 and 4732.17.
We find that at least one or both of the secondary requirements under R.C. 149.43(A)(2)(a) or (b) also exist. Release of the record creates a high probability of disclosure of uncharged suspects or informants to "whom confidentiality has been reasonably promised." Decisions to delay or not file charges do not override the confidential law enforcement investigatory exception. State, ex rel. Thompson Newspapers, Inc., v. Martin (1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 28, 546 N.E.2d 939.
Under the specific facts of this case, we are satisfied that an in camera inspection is not required. But, see, State, ex rel. Outlet Communications, Inc., v. Lancaster Police Dept. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 324, 528 N.E.2d 175; State, ex rel. Fostoria Daily Review Co., v. Fostoria Hosp. Assn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 10, 531 N.E.2d 313. The identity of uncharged suspects and confidential witnesses or information sources would necessarily be intertwined with any retained investigatory records.
This material may also qualify as an exempt "trial preparation record," und...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson
...at least in some cases, Crim.R. 16 would be an adequate remedy. Scanlon fostered such cases as State ex rel. McGee v. Ohio State Bd. of Psychology (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 59, 550 N.E.2d 945, State ex rel. Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Merillat (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 152, 553 N.E.2d 646, State ex r......
-
T.R., In re
... 52 Ohio St.3d 6 ... 556 N.E.2d 439, 59 USLW 2087, 17 ... In re T.R., a Juvenile ... The STATE, ex rel. DISPATCH PRINTING COMPANY, Appellee, ... McGee, v. Ohio State Bd. of Psychology (1990), 49 Ohio ... ...
-
State v. Clarence Mack, 93-LW-5104
... STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CLARENCE MACK, ... Ohio Supreme Court in State, ex rel. Shane v. New ... Philadelphia Police Dept. (1990), ... St.3d 20; State, ex rel. McGee v. Ohio St. Board of ... Psychology (1990), 49 Ohio ... ...
-
The State Ex Rel. Mahajan v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio.
...that the records pertain to a law-enforcement matter of an administrative nature. See State ex rel. McGee v. Ohio State Bd. of Psychology (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 59, 60, 550 N.E.2d 945, overruled in part on other grounds, State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 639 N.E.2d......