State ex rel. Merrill v. Burns

Decision Date31 October 1877
PartiesTHE STATE ex rel. MERRILL, Appellant v. BURNS et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Schuyler Circuit Court.--HON. JOHN W. HENRY, Judge.

C. E. Vrooman, F. T. Hughes, Harrington & Cover and Higbee & Shelton for appellant

McGoldrick & Caywood for respondents, cited Martin v. Henley, 13 Mo. 312; Leahey v. Duydale, 41 Mo. 517.

HOUGH, J.

At the August term, 1874, of the Schuyler circuit court, in a suit brought by plaintiff against the defendants upon an administrator's bond, wherein the defendant, Burns, was principal, and the defendant, Grant, was surety, final judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant, Grant. At the next term of said court, the defendant, Grant, filed a motion to set aside the judgment rendered against him for alleged irregularity in the rendition thereof, and for other causes, which motion was sustained by the court. Thereupon the plaintiff took the present appeal.

When a judgment is arrested, or set aside, no appeal can be taken until another final judgment is entered in the cause. In the present case, the plaintiff, in order to have the action of the trial court, in setting aside a judgment rendered by it at a previous term, reviewed by this court, should have refused to proceed further with the cause, and permitted final judgment to be rendered against him. Garesche v. Emerson, 31 Mo. 258; Gilstrap v. Felts, 50 Mo. 431; Bowie v. City of Kansas, 51 Mo. 459.

The appeal is manifestly premature, and must therefore be dismissed.

The other judges concur, except Judge HENRY, who did not sit.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Curtiss v. Bell
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 25 Mayo 1908
    ... ... defendant in attending to the case, neither does it state any ... facts from which the court could determine whether or not the ... Mo. 58; Murphy v. DeFrance, 101 Mo. 151; State ... ex rel. v. Renick, 157 Mo. 292; Harbor v ... Railroad, 32 Mo. 423; Lovitt v ... 378; Bried v ... Hobard, 187 Mo. 140; State ex rel. v. Burns, 66 ... Mo. 227. (2) The judgment being irregular upon the face of ... ...
  • Stephens v. D.M. Oberman Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 9 Abril 1934
    ... ... determined by the common law. [State ex rel. Conant v ... Trimble, 311 Mo. 128, 277 S.W. 916.] The purpose of ... 431; Bowie v ... Kansas City, 51 Mo. 459; State ex rel. Merrill v ... Burns, 66 Mo. 227.] Our statute (Sec. 1006, R. S. 1929) ... ...
  • Iron Mountain Bank v. Armstrong
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 20 Junio 1887
    ...and voluntary. Hence, neither the order of dismissal nor the order sustaining the motion for new trial can be appealed from. State v. Burns, 66 Mo. 227; McDonough Nickerson, 46 Mo. 35; Byers v. Butterfield, 33 Mo. 376; State v. Smith, 65 Mo. 467; Boggess v. Cox, 48 Mo. 278. Ray, J. Sherwood......
  • State ex rel. Wendling v. Arnold
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 6 Febrero 1917
    ... ... the judgment is rendered. Bussiere's Adm. v ... Sayman, 257 Mo. 303; Kidder v. Wright, 72 ... Mo.App. 378; State, ex rel. Merrill, v. Burns, et ... al., 66 Mo. 227; Smith v. Perkins, 124 Mo. 50; ... Freeman on Judgments, paragraph 90 ...          ALLEN, ... J ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT