State ex rel. Nicholson v. Jackson
Decision Date | 12 May 1977 |
Citation | 377 N.E.2d 523,8 O.O.3d 372,54 Ohio App.2d 215 |
Parties | , 8 O.O.3d 372 The STATE ex rel. NICHOLSON, Appellants, v. JACKSON, Director, et al., Appellees. |
Court | Ohio Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court
The mere allegation in a complaint regarding the appropriation of property that a municipality has agreed to eliminate parking by the relator's business, thereby causing such an interference with his access rights as to constitute a taking, is insufficient to sustain the granting of a writ of mandamus.
Hugh E. Kirkwood, Jr., Columbus and Danny D. Johnson, New Philadelphia, for appellants.
William J. Brown, Atty. Gen., Perry R. Silverman, Donald J. Guittar, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Leslie R. Early, New Philadelphia, for appellees.
Relators appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding that their complaint in mandamus fails to state a claim for relief, raising a single assignment of error, as follows:
"The trial court erred in finding that a suggestion or plan to eliminate parking on S. Broadway Street does not constitute a taking of property, or property rights of Relators."
The complaint alleges that relators are the owners of a commercial building in New Philadelphia, Ohio. The complaint further alleges that, in November 1973, and January 1974, relators received written offers from the respondent, Ohio Department of Transportation to acquire access rights to their property in connection with a highway improvement on South Broadway Street in New philadelphia also known as State Route 800, Tuscarawas County. Subsequent to the receipt of those offers, respondent altered the right-of-way plans and deleted the limited access provisions on South Broadway Street in the vicinity of relators' property. Thereafter, on May 3, 1976, the respondent city of New Philadelphia passed a resolution to cooperate with the respondent Director of Transportation and approving and adopting the plans, specifications and estimates for the highway improvement as approved by the Director of Transportation. Although the body of the resolution does not mention parking, one of the "whereas" clauses states that the city of New Philadelphia resolves "to eliminate parking on the through-traffic roadways and ramps of the improvement and to keep them open to traffic at all times." Paragraph eleven of the complaint alleges that, by this resolution " * * * the City of New Philadelphia, Ohio, was required to eliminate parking on the east and west side of South Broadway Street between Front Street and Bank Lane, thus depriving Relators of their access rights without compensation."
Relators sought a writ of mandamus requiring respondents to file appropriation proceedings to acquire relators' access rights and to compensate them therefor.
There is no allegation of a physical taking of any of relators' property but, rather, merely an allegation to the effect that the agreement to eliminate parking on South Broadway constitutes such an interference with relators' access rights as to be a taking of their property. Even assuming that interference with access rights be involved, the situation is somewhat similar to that involved in the unreported decision rendered in State ex rel. Edmisten v. Jackson, No. 75AP-557, Court of Appeals of Franklin County, July 1, 1976, in which decision this court held:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kermetz v. Cook-Johnson Realty Corp.
...case of J. P. Sand & Gravel Co. v. State (1976), 51 Ohio App.2d 83, 367 N.E.2d 54 (decided June 8, 1976); State ex rel. Nicholson v. Jackson (1977), 54 Ohio App.2d 215, 377 N.E.2d 523, and the unreported case of State ex rel. Edmisten v. Jackson, No. 75AP-557, decided July 1, The factual pa......
-
Swenson v. Ewy
... ... "I/we further state that I/we have carefully read the ... ...
-
Nacelle Land Mgt. Corp. v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, 89AP-324
...State, ex rel. Edmisten, v. Jackson (July 1, 1976), Franklin App. No. 75AP-557, unreported, and State, ex rel. Nicholson, v. Jackson (1977), 54 Ohio App.2d 215, 8 O.O.3d 372, 377 N.E.2d 523, which denied writs of mandamus based upon a taking and concluded that the Court of Claims was the pr......
-
Huelsmann v. State
...of Appeals, in State ex rel. Edmisten v. Jackson, unreported, No. 75AP-557, decided July 1, 1976, and State ex rel. Nicholson v. Jackson (1977), 54 Ohio App.2d 215, 377 N.E.2d 523, in which the court denied writs of mandamus on the basis that in actions seeking damages against the state for......