State ex rel. Nutt v. Cincinnati

Decision Date19 October 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93-1900,93-1900
PartiesThe STATE ex rel. NUTT, Appellant, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI; Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Claimant filed a complaint in mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, alleging that the commission abused its discretion in denying further prescription payment. The appellate court denied the writ. This cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right.

Kondritzer, Gold, Frank & Crowley Co., L.P.A., and Lane N. Cohen, Cincinnati, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Atty. Gen., and William J. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Former R.C. 4123.651(A) stated:

"Any employee who is injured or disabled in the course of his employment shall have free choice to select a licensed physician as he may desire to have serve him, as well as medical, surgical, nursing, and hospital services and attention * * *."

Because this section guarantees a free choice of physicians, claimant argues that the commission must approve and pay, without question, any treatment authorized by that doctor. We disagree.

Former R.C. 4121.121(P) provided:

"The administrator shall establish and maintain a medical section within the bureau. The medical section shall do all of the following:

"(1) Assist the administrator in establishing standard medical fees, approving medical procedures, and determining eligibility and reasonableness of the compensation payments for medical, hospital, and nursing services, and in establishing guidelines for payment policies which recognize usual, customary, and reasonable methods of payment for covered services[.]"

Former R.C. 4121.44 provided:

"The administrator of workers' compensation shall adopt rules to ensure that the following requirements are met with respect to any payments made to health care providers for claims pursuant to Chapter 4123. of the Revised Code:

" * * * "(B) Determine appropriateness of drug charges and doctor bills[.]"

Finally, former R.C. 4123.66 directed:

"In addition to the compensation provided for in this chapter, the administrator of workers' compensation shall disburse and pay from the state insurance fund the amounts for medical, nurse, and hospital services and medicine as he deems proper * * *." (Emphasis added.)

These statutes clearly empowered the commission and bureau to oversee claim expenditures made to health-care providers. This authority was validated in State ex rel. Campbell v. Indus. Comm. (1971), 28 Ohio St.2d 154, 57 O.O.2d 397, 277 N.E.2d 219. There, we upheld the commission's decision to limit the claimant to one chiropractic treatment per month, writing:

"Relator [claimant] contends that as the injured employee of a self-insurer, he has complete freedom of choice in selection of the type and extent of medical services under R.C. 4123.651. He argues that any restriction of that freedom constitutes an abuse of discretion unless it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that such treatment is not reasonably commensurate with the needs of the injury.

"R.C. 4123.651 does give an injured workman the right to select his own medical and related services. Additionally, however, the section provides that ' * * * in the event the employee of a self-insurer selects a physician or medical, surgical, nursing, or hospital services rather than have them furnished directly by his employer, the costs of such services, subject to the approval of the commission, shall be the obligation of the employer.'

"In lodging authority in the claimant to select his physician and medical services, the General Assembly also granted broad discretion to the Industrial Commission to approve or disapprove the cost of such services." (Emphasis sic.) Id. at 156-157, 57 O.O.2d at 398, 277 N.E.2d at 221.

Campbell was followed by State ex rel. Breno v. Indus. Comm. (1973), 34...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • October 19, 1994
  • Northwestern Ohio Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Conrad
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • July 18, 2001
    ...Act historically required the commission and bureau to perform as part of their administrative duties. See State ex rel. Nutt v. Cincinnati (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 594, 639 N.E.2d 1196; State ex rel. Breno v. Indus. Comm. (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 227, 63 O.O.2d 378, 298 N.E.2d 150; State ex rel.......
  • State ex rel. Miller v. Indus. Comm.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1994
    ...State ex rel. Campbell v. Indus. Comm. (1971), 28 Ohio St.2d 154, 57 O.O.2d 397, 277 N.E.2d 219; State ex rel. Nutt v. Cincinnati (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 594, 639 N.E.2d 1196. Campbell has been interpreted as articulating a three-pronged test for the authorization of medical services: (1) are......
  • State ex rel. Navistar Internatl. Transp. Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 2005 Ohio 3284 (OH 6/28/2005)
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 28, 2005
    ...balance the necessity of treatment against the cost to the employer, relator cites Campbell and Breno, as well as State ex rel. Nutt v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 594. In Campbell, the claimant sought approval for chiropractic treatments. The Supreme Court held that the commission d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT