State ex rel. Nutter v. Boles

Decision Date05 October 1965
Docket NumberNo. 12495,12495
Citation144 S.E.2d 238,150 W.Va. 93
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE ex rel. William Leroy NUTTER, Jr. v. Otto C. BOLES, Warden West Virginia Penitentiary.

Syllabus by the Court

'In the absence of a written information filed with the court, setting forth the previous conviction and sentence, or convictions and sentences, an additional sentence imposed, under the provisions of Section 18, Article 11, Chapter 61, Code, 1931, as amended, is void.' Point 1, syllabus, State ex rel. Cox v. Boles, 146 W.Va. 392 .

Jack D. Huffman, Charleston, for relator.

C. Donald Robertson, Atty. Gen., George H. Mitchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for respondent.

CAPLAN, Judge.

In this original proceeding in habeas corpus the petitioner, William Leroy Nutter, Jr., alleging that he is 'unlawfully and illegally imprisoned and deprived of his liberty', seeks a writ to compel the respondent to release him from his custody. The writ was issued by this Court on July 26, 1965, returnable September 21, 1965, and counsel was appointed to represent the petitioner in this proceeding. On the return day the respondent produced the petitioner in Court and filed a return and demurrer to the petition. The case was thereupon submitted for decision upon the aforesaid pleadings and upon the briefs and arguments of counsel.

On April 5, 1962 William Leroy Nutter, Jr., together with four other persons, was indicted by the grand jury of the Circuit Court of Fayette County, West Virginia, for the crime of breaking and entering a certain store building. The petitioner failed to appear for arraignment, which was set for May 22, 1962, and a capias was issued for his arrest. Nutter was later apprehended and on January 16, 1963 was arraigned and entered a plea of guilty. Prior to said arraignment counsel was appointed to assist the petitioner in that proceeding.

Upon the entry and acceptance of the guilty plea, the prosecuting attorney announced to the court that the petitioner had been previously convicted and sentenced for a felony. Thereupon, the petitioner having admitted that he was the same William Leroy Nutter, Jr. who had been previously so convicted, the court sentenced him to confinement in the West Virginia Penitentiary for an indeterminate term of one to fifteen years.

In this proceeding it is contended that the sentence so imposed is void for the reason that no written information was filed with the court as required by the provisions of Code, 1931, 61-11-19, as amended. Furthermore, the petitioner asserts that his conviction and sentence are void because he was afforded ineffective counsel. We have carefully considered the latter assertion and find it to be wholly without merit.

This petitioner was convicted of the crime of breaking and entering a building other than a dwelling house, the statutory sentence for which is one to ten years. Code, 1931, 61-3-12. Yet, he was sentenced to one to fifteen years. The additional five years were obviously imposed under the provisions of Code, 1931, 61-11-18, as amended. Before an additional sentence may be imposed under that statute it is imperative that the procedure detailed in Code, 1931, 61-11-19, as amended, be complied with. This Court consistently has held that the provisions of said Section 19 are mandatory and must be complied with fully for the imposition of a valid sentence of further confinement under the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Wanstreet v. Bordenkircher
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 10 Marzo 1981
    ...principles, recidivist sentences have been vacated for failure to file the recidivist information in writing, State ex rel. Nutter v. Boles, 150 W.Va. 93, 144 S.E.2d 238 (1965); State ex rel. Cox v. Boles, 146 W.Va. 392, 120 S.E.2d 707 (1961); State ex rel. Yokum v. Adams, 145 W.Va. 450, 11......
  • State ex rel. Widmyer v. Boles
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 12 Octubre 1965
    ...term provided by statute for the principal offense and any valid additional sentence for any prior felony conviction. State ex rel. Nutter v. Boles, W.Va., 144 S.E.2d 238; State ex rel. Holstein v. Boles, W.Va., 143 S.E.2d 821; State ex rel. Truman v. Boles, W.Va., 143 S.E.2d 820; State ex ......
  • State v. Deal
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 27 Mayo 1987
    ...177 W.Va. 53, 350 S.E.2d 565 (1986); State ex rel. Ringer v. Boles, 151 W.Va. 864, 157 S.E.2d 554 (1967); State ex rel. Nutter v. Boles, 150 W.Va. 93, 144 S.E.2d 238 (1965). Accordingly, we have held that " '[a] person convicted of a felony cannot be sentenced under the habitual criminal st......
  • State ex rel. Ringer v. Boles
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 31 Octubre 1967
    ...has consistently held that the habitual criminal statutes of this state are mandatory and jurisdictional. State ex rel. Nutter v. Boles, 150 W.Va. 93, 95, 144 S.E.2d 238, 239; State ex rel. Albright v. Boles, 149 W.Va. 561, pt. 1 syl., 142 S.E.2d 725; State ex rel. Beckett v. Boles, 149 W.V......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT