State ex rel. Park Inv. Co. v. Board of Tax Appeals

Decision Date24 December 1968
Docket NumberNo. 68-277,68-277
Citation16 Ohio St.2d 85,242 N.E.2d 887
Parties, 45 O.O.2d 440 The STATE ex rel. the PARK INVESTMENT CO., v. BOARD OF TAX APPEALS et al.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Forrester & Kovanda, Cleveland, for relator.

William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., and Edgar L. Lindley, Columbus, for respondent, Board of Tax Appeals.

John T. Corrigan, Pros. Atty., A. M. Braun, John L. Dowling and Thomas P. Cyrus, Cleveland, for respondent, Ralph J. Perk, Auditor of Cuyahoga County.

PER CURIAM.

The question which this case presents is: Do Sections 5715.01 and 5715.24, Revised Code, and Section 2 of Article XII of the Ohio Constitution and Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution require statewide uniformity in the assessment of real property for taxation?

This court holds that the Board of Tax Appeals is required to supervise the assessment for taxation of all real property within the state and, pursuant to Section 5715.01, Revised Code, the board is obligated to 'adopt, prescribe, and promulgate rules for the assessment of real property by uniform rule according to value. * * * The uniform rules shall prescribe methods of determining the true value and taxable value of real property. The rules shall provide that true value and taxable value be determined on the basis of all facts and circumstances which the board finds necessary in order to achieve uniformity and avoid overvaluation or undervaluation and discrimination. The taxable value shall not exceed fifty per cent of true value in money. The uniform rules shall * * * prescribe methods of making the appraisals * * *. County auditors shall, under the direction and supervision of the board, be the chief assessing officers of their respective counties, and shall list and value the real property within their respective counties for taxation' in accordance with Section 5715.02 and Section 5713.03, Revised Code, and the rules of the Board of Tax Appeals. (Emphasis added.)

Thus, it is the mandatory duty of the Board of Tax Appeals to see that all real property within the state of Ohio is assessed at a uniform percentage of its true value in money, which assessed value shall not exceed fifty per cent of its true value in money.

Section 5715.24, Revised Code, requires:

'The board of tax appeals, annually, at a meeting to be held at its office in Columbus on the first Monday in August, or on the date thereafter to which such meeting is adjourned, shall determine whether the real property and the various classes thereof in the several counties, municipal corporations, and taxing districts have been assessed by an equal and uniform rule at taxable value, and if the board finds that the real property or any class thereof in any county, municipal corporation, or taxing district, as reported by the several county auditors to it, is not listed by uniform rule at taxable value, the board shall increase or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • State ex rel. Swetland v. Kinney
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • April 2, 1980
    ...218 N.E.2d 723; Frederick Bldg. Co. v. Bd. of Revision (1968), 13 Ohio St.2d 59, 233 N.E.2d 594; State ex rel. Park Invest. Co. v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1968), 16 Ohio St.2d 85, 242 N.E.2d 887; State ex rel. Park Invest. Co. v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1971), 26 Ohio St.2d 161, 270 N.E.2d Certainl......
  • Black v. Board of Revision of Cuyahoga County
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • March 27, 1985
    ...the Park Investment Company. See State, ex rel. Park Invest. Co., v. Bd. of Tax Appeals, supra; State, ex rel. Park Invest. Co., v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1968), 16 Ohio St.2d 85, 242 N.E.2d 887 ; State ex rel. Park Invest. Co., v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1971), 26 Ohio St.2d 161, 270 N.E.2d 342 ;......
  • State ex rel. Park Inv. Co. v. Board of Tax Appeals
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 2, 1971
    ...as required by the granting of the writ of mandamus by this court in December 1968, as reported in State ex rel. Park Invest. Co. v. Bd. of Tax Appeals, 16 Ohio St.2d 85, 242 N.E.2d 887. In that case, the court stated '* * * it is the mandatory duty of the Board of Tax Appeals to see that a......
  • Meyer v. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Revision
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 13, 1979
    ...ex rel. Park Investment Co., v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1964), 175 Ohio St. 410, 195 N.E.2d 908; State, ex rel. Park Investment Co., v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1968), 16 Ohio St.2d 85, 242 N.E.2d 887; State, ex rel. Park Investment Co., v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1971), 26 Ohio St.2d 161, 270 N.E.2d 34......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT