State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Shain
Decision Date | 08 August 1938 |
Docket Number | 35910 |
Citation | 119 S.W.2d 220,342 Mo. 867 |
Parties | State of Missouri at the relation of Public Service Commission of the State, Relator, v. Hopkins B. Shain, Ewing C. Bland and Robert M. Reynolds, Judges of the Kansas City Court of Appeals |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Writ quashed.
James H. Linton, General Counsel, and Daniel C Rogers, Assistant Counsel, for Public Service Commission.
(1) In fixing a schedule of just and reasonable rates for any public utility, the Public Service Commission is not bound by any hard and fast rule nor is it required to fix rates according to any general formula. State ex rel. Capital City Water Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 298 Mo. 524, 252 S.W. 454; State ex rel. Harrisonville v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 291 Mo. 432, 236 S.W. 858; State ex rel. St. Louis v. Pub Serv. Comm., 329 Mo. 918, 47 S.W.2d 104. (2) Interference by the Kansas City Court of Appeals with the discretionary legislative powers of the Public Service Commission is in conflict with the entire spirit of the Public Service Commission Act, as declared by the Supreme Court. State ex rel. Rhodes v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 270 Mo 566, 194 S.W. 287; Mo. Southern Railroad Co. v. Pub Serv. Comm., 279 Mo. 489, 214 S.W. 379; State ex rel. St. Louis v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 326 Mo. 751, 34 S.W.2d 510, Id., 329 Mo. 918, 47 S.W.2d 104. Fixing of rate schedules is a legislative and not a judicial function. An exercise of the legislative function by the judiciary is in conflict with the following controlling decisions of the Supreme Court of Missouri: State ex rel. Kansas City P. & L. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 335 Mo. 1248, 76 S.W.2d 350; State ex rel. C. G. W. Railroad Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 330 Mo. 729, 51 S.W.2d 76; State ex rel. Detroit-Chicago Motor Bus Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 324 Mo. 270, 23 S.W.2d 117; Lusk v. Atkinson, 268 Mo. 109, 186 S.W. 703.
H. H. Larimore, Geo. W. Holmes, Thos. J. Cole and R. W. Hedrick for respondents.
(1) The order entered by the Public Service Commission of Missouri in its Case No. 8966 and here under review is invalid because unsupported by testimony. New England Divisions Case, 261 U.S. 185; Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Union Pac. Ry. Co., 222 U.S. 547; Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. United States, 234 U.S. 167; State ex rel. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 233 S.W. 425; State ex rel. St. Louis v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 47 S.W.2d 102, 329 Mo. 918; State ex rel. Henson v. Brown, 31 S.W.2d 208, 326 Mo. 230. (2) The order of the Public Service Commission here under review is invalid because the commission is without authority when fixing reasonable maximum rail rates to give consideration to rates by truck or to any competitive situation brought about by reason of truck rates. In prescribing maximum rail rates the commission can consider only transportation conditions affecting transportation by rail and cannot require rail carriers to reduce their rates theretofore established as reasonable by the commission for the purpose of meeting rates established by competing and cheaper forms of transportation, such as motor trucks and water carriers. Wisconsin, Minn. & Pac. Railroad v. Jacobson, 179 U.S. 297; Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Alabama Midland Ry. Co., 168 U.S. 172; Interstate Commerce Comm. v. C. G. W. Ry. Co., 209 U.S. 108; Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United States, 249 U.S. 557; State ex rel. v. Mo. Pub. Serv. Comm., 270 Mo. 429; State ex rel. v. Mo. Pub. Serv. Comm., 277 Mo. 175; State ex rel. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 250 Mo. 704; In re Interstate Transit Lines, 18 Mo. P. S. C. 257; Shaw-Fahrer Grain Co. v. Pub. Utilities Comm., 183 N.E. 922; Stockton Port District v. So. Pac. Co., 200 I. C. C. 783; Corporation Comm. of Va. v. A. & R. Ry. Co., 161 I. C. C. 273; Mountain Pac. Oil Cases, 192 I. C. C. 559; Ann Arbor Railroad Co. v. United States, 281 U.S. 659; Oregon & Wash. Lbr. Mfgrs. Assn. v. Union Pac. Ry. Co., 14 I. C. C. 1; Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Union Pac. Ry., Co., 222 U.S. 541, 56 L.Ed. 308, 32 S.Ct. 108; Florida Fruit & Vegetable Shippers' Protective Assn. v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co., 17 I. C. C. 552; Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. United States, 234 U.S. 167; Winona Oil Co. v. Director-General, 57 I. C. C. 152.
This is certiorari to the Kansas City Court of Appeals to review the judgment of that court in the case of State ex rel. and to use of Alton Railroad Co. et al. v. Public Service Commission et al., reported in 110 S.W.2d 1121, wherein that court reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County which affirmed the report and order of the relator in fixing a maximum rate for bituminous coal and bituminous coal briquettes of steam railroads, in intrastate carload lots, for distances from 25 to 95 miles.
Respondents, in their opinion, stated the facts as follows:
The questions decided by respondents as stated in the opinion are as follows:
In passing on these questions, the respondents ruled that:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Bland
... ... State ex rel. Prudential ... Ins. Co. v. Shain, 344 Mo. 623, 127 S.W.2d 675; ... State ex rel. Casualty Co. v. Cox, 14 ... ...
-
State ex rel. Jones Store Co. v. Shain
... ... Travelers Ins. Co., 304 Mo. 487, 263 S.W. 819; State ... ex rel. Mo. Public Utilities Co. v. Cox, 298 Mo. 427, ... 250 S.W. 551; Wills v. Berberich's Delivery Co., 345 Mo ... ...
-
State ex rel. McKittrick v. Missouri Public Service Com'n
... ... 29 State of Missouri at the Relation of Roy McKittrick, Attorney General, Appellant, v. Missouri Public Service Commission, Laclede Power & Light Company, and Union Electric Company of Missouri No. 38733 Supreme Court of Missouri November 18, 1943 ... effect. State ex rel. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Trimble, ... 307 Mo. 536; State ex rel. Public Serv. Comm. v ... Shain, 342 Mo. 867. (8) It is not required that ... necessity for the sale be shown or that the customers will ... benefit therefrom. In re Union ... ...
-
State ex rel. Johnson v. Blair
... ... Himmelsbach v. Becker, 85 S.W.2d 420; State ex rel ... Snider v. Shain, 137 S.W. 2d) 527; State ex rel ... Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v ... withdrawn. Arnot v. Alexander, 44 Mo. 25; State ... ex rel. Public Serv. Comm. v. Shain, 119 S.W.2d 220; ... St. Louis v. St. Louis Gaslight ... considered. State ex rel. St. Louis Public Service ... Company v. Becker, 334 Mo. 115, 66 S.W.2d 141, 146. Had ... a deed ... 1075, 163 S.W.2d 967, 969; State ex rel. Public Service ... Commission v. Shain, 342 Mo. 867, 119 S.W.2d 220, 222 ... Relator takes the ... ...