State ex rel. Ricketts v. Balsly

Decision Date01 March 1961
Docket NumberNo. 36765,36765
Citation173 N.E.2d 117,171 Ohio St. 553
Parties, 15 O.O.2d 12 STATE ex rel. RICKETTS, Appellant, v. BALSLY, Bldg. Inspector, Appellee.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Osborne, Chacksfield & Osborne, Cincinnati, for appellant.

C. Watson Hover, Pros. Atty., and Raymond C. Wetherell, Cincinnati, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The relator was afforded an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of injunction or by appealing from the decision of the county building inspector to the Board of Zoning Appeals (Section 303.15, Revised Code), and from the Board of Zoning Appeals to the Court of Common Pleas (Chapter 2506, Revised Code), which latter remedy he had in fact successfully pursued.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed. State ex rel. Grant v. Kiefaber et al., Montgomery County Planning Commission, 171 Ohio St. 326, 170 N.E.2d 848.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State ex rel. Thomas v. Ludewig
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • October 22, 1962
    ...State ex rel. Grant, Ex'r v. Kiefaber, et al., Montgomery County Planning Comm., supra. See, also, State ex rel. Ricketts v. Balsly, Bldg. Insp., 171 Ohio St. 553, 173 N.E.2d 117, holding relator had an adequate remedy by way of injunction or by appealing from the decision of the county bui......
  • State ex rel. River Grove Park, Inc. v. City of Kettering
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • April 2, 1962
    ...of East Cleveland, Ohio App., 88 N.E.2d 300; Henle v. City of Euclid, 97 Ohio App. 258, 125 N.E.2d 355; State ex rel. Ricketts v. Balsly, Bldg. Insp., 171 Ohio St. 553, 173 N.E.2d 117; State ex rel. Gund Co., v. Village of Solon, 171 Ohio St. 318, 170 N.E.2d 487; State ex rel. Fredrix, v. V......
  • Biris' Estate, In re
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1961
    ... ... the provisions of Section 5731.19, Revised Code, does not enter the State Treasury within the meaning of Section 22, Article II of the Ohio ... ,' is fully supported by the decision of this court in State, ex rel. Ellsworth v. Mong, 130 Ohio St. 483, 200 N.E. 516, 517. In that case a ... ...
  • State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. Hicks
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1964
    ...487; State ex rel. Fredrix v. Village of Beachwood (1960), 171 Ohio St. 343, 170 N.E.2d 847; State ex rel. Ricketts v. Balsly, Building Inspector (1961), 171 Ohio St. 553, 173 N.E.2d 117, that the right to appeal pursuant to Chapter 2506, Revised Code, is an adequate remedy at law, and, the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT