State ex rel. Robbins v. Gideon
Decision Date | 24 December 1934 |
Docket Number | No. 5509.,5509. |
Citation | 77 S.W.2d 647 |
Parties | STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. T.J. ROBBINS, RELATOR, v. ROBERT L. GIDEON, JUDGE, RESPONDENT. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
G.W. Rogers for relator.
J.L. Bess and E.M. Wright for respondent.
This is an original proceeding by certiorari instituted in this court by relator to quash the order of Honorable Robert L. Gideon, Judge of the Circuit Court of Taney County, Missouri, made on the 10th day of June, 1933, setting aside a decree of divorce rendered in favor of relator, plaintiff in the divorce suit, on the 29th day of May, 1933. The petition for the writ is in part as follows: "Relator states that at the regular April term of the Circuit Court of Taney County, Missouri, an order was made by the circuit court on the 3rd day of May, 1933, adjourning said term of court until the 10th day of June, 1933.
The record in this case shows that on May 3, 1933, the regular April term, 1933, of the Circuit Court of Taney County was adjourned until June 10, 1933, and that on the 29th day of May, 1933, a special term of the Taney County Circuit Court was held. The record does not show that a written order calling said special term was filed with the clerk of the court. The only record in regard to the holding said special term of court is as follows:
Following this in the record is the decree of divorce in which it is set forth that defendant therein had entered her appearance and waived service of process. This waiver of service was in writing, duly filed with the clerk, and is as follows:
At the adjourned term held on June 10, 1933, defendant in said divorce suit, respondent herein, filed her motion to set aside said decree of divorce, setting up fraud in the procuring of the waiver of service, duress, condonment, failure to mention an infant child of the marriage in the divorce petition and other matters. Thereafter, and on the same day, the court sustained the motion setting aside the decree of divorce. The sole question now presented to this court is whether or not the Circuit Court of Taney County had the power or jurisdiction to sustain the motion setting aside said decree of divorce rendered at the special term held on May 29, 1933.
The statute authorizing the circuit court to call a special term in vacation was enacted in 1921 (see Laws 1921, p. 254), now Section 1852, Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1929. The law reads as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Green v. James
...v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 111 S.W.2d 103; Bucholz v. Manzella, 158 S.W.2d 200; Jeude v. Sims, 258 Mo. 26, 166 S.W. 1048; State ex rel. v. Gideon, 77 S.W.2d 647; Restatement of the Law, Conflict of Laws, sec. Hartle v. Hartle, 184 S.W.2d 786; Grenzebach v. Grenzebach, 118 Mo.App. 280; 94 S.W. ......
-
Pike v. Pike
...because of lack of the jurisdictional averments. Cox v. Cox, 115 S.W.2d 104; St. ex rel. Coonley v. Hall, 246 S.W. 35; St. ex rel. Robbins v. Gideon, 77 S.W.2d 647. decisions of the appellate courts are unanimous that such a petition confers no jurisdiction. Barricelli v. Barricelli, 300 S.......
-
Theener v. Kurn
...This rule is applicable to cases arising in the circuit court. State v. Baker, 246 Mo. 357, 372, 152 S.W. 46; State ex rel. Robbins v. Gideon, 228 Mo. App. 1023, 77 S.W.2d 647. In view of the state of the record a question suggests itself as to whether this presumption could be indulged eve......
- State ex rel. Robbins v. Gideon