State ex rel. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc. v. Studebaker, 38316
| Decision Date | 02 October 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. 38316,38316 |
| Citation | 193 N.E.2d 84,24 O.O.2d 309,175 Ohio St. 222 |
| Parties | , 24 O.O.2d 309 The STATE ex rel. ROGER J. AU & SON, INC., a Taxpayer, Appellant. v. STUDEBAKER et al., Commissioners of Montgomery County, et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Marshall & Smith, Dayton, and Robert L. Ross, Mansfield, for appellant.
Bieser, Greer & Landis, Dayton, Paul R. Young, Pros. Atty., and Paul J. Fleischauer, Dayton, for appellees.
Relator has an adequate remedy by way of injunction. This court will ordinarily, in the exercise of its discretion, deny a writ of mandamus where the relator has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law, including an equitable remedy. State ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St. 302, 123 N.E.2d 23; State, ex rel. Al Monzo Construction Co., Inc. v. Board of Control of City of Warren, 172 Ohio St. 370, 176 N.E.2d 427.
The Court of Appeals has the same discretionary power with respect to the allowance of a writ of mandamus in such a case originating in that court. State ex rel. Cotleur v. Board of Education of Cleveland Heights School Dist., 171 Ohio St. 335, 170 N.E.2d 845; State ex rel. Grant, Jr., Exr. v. Kiefaber et al. Montgomery County Planning Comm., 171 Ohio St. 326, 170 N.E.2d 848.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial Commission
...rel. Adams v. Rockwell et al., Bd. of Edn. (1957), 167 Ohio St. 15, 145 N.E.2d 665, and State ex rel. Roger J. Au and Son, Inc. v. Studebaker et al., Commrs. (1963), 175 Ohio St. 222, 193 N.E.2d 84. Although the language in the opinions in those two cases does not state the rule as accurate......
-
State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of Berea
...309, 175 N.E.2d 511; State ex rel. Moran v. Welling, Dir., 172 Ohio St. 516, 178 N.E.2d 786; State ex rel. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc. v. Studebaker et al., Com'rs, 175 Ohio St. 222, 193 N.E.2d 84, and State ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Indus. Comm., 162 Ohio St. 302, 123 N.E.2d The p......
-
State ex rel. Williams v. City of Canton
...170 N.E.2d 848; State, ex rel. Tempero, v. Colopy (1962), 173 Ohio St. 122, 123, 180 N.E.2d 273; State, ex rel. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc., v. Studebaker (1963), 175 Ohio St. 222, 193 N.E.2d 84; Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas (1963), 175 Ohio St. 251, 252, 193 N.E.2d 393; State, ex rel. Vito......
-
State ex rel. Hanson v. Guernsey Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
...deny a writ of mandamus where the relator has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, including an equitable remedy." Id.); State ex rel. Al Monzo Constr. Co., Inc. v. Warren Bd. of Control (1961), 172 Ohio St. 370, 16 O.O.2d 220, 176 N.E.2d 427. Accord State ex rel. Cotl......