State ex rel. Semik v. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Elections
Citation | 617 N.E.2d 1120,67 Ohio St.3d 334 |
Decision Date | 15 September 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 93-1238,93-1238 |
Parties | The STATE ex rel. SEMIK v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY et al. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Pros. Atty., and Michael P. Butler, Asst. Pros. Atty., for respondents.
Seeley, Savidge & Aussem and William E. Blackie III, Cleveland, for intervening respondents.
Relator contended that the special election violated Article X of the Independence City Charter. Article X states that, upon receipt of a petition proposing a charter amendment signed by at least ten percent of the registered voters of the city, the council "shall submit such proposed amendment to the electors at the next general or regular municipal election." The proposed amendment in this case was to be submitted at a special election to be held on August 3, 1993, which was neither a general nor regular municipal election date, in clear violation of the charter. However, Section 9 of Article XVIII, Ohio Constitution, states in part that submission of charter amendments to the electorate "shall be governed by the requirements of section 8 [of Article XVIII] as to the submission of the question of choosing a charter commission," and Section 8 of Article XVIII states in relevant part:
"The ordinance providing for the submission of such question shall require that it be submitted to the electors at the next regular municipal election if one shall occur not less than sixty nor more than one hundred and twenty days after its passage; otherwise it shall provide for the submission of the question at a special election to be called and held within the time aforesaid."
In this case, the ordinance certifying the proposed amendment to the board of elections was passed on May 25, 1993; August 3, 1993, the date of the special election, was between sixty and one hundred twenty days after passage of the ordinance, as required by Section 8 of Article XVIII, Ohio Constitution, since no general or regular municipal election occurred within that time. Thus, the special election complied with the Constitution, but violated the charter.
In Billington v. Cotner (1971), 25 Ohio St.2d 140, at 146, 54 O.O.2d 270, at 273, 267 N.E.2d 410, at 414, we held that the "manifest object" of Section 9 of Article XVIII
Relator argues that municipal corporations may "exercise all powers of local self-government" under Section 3 of Article XVIII, Ohio Constitution, and that this "home rule" authority allows the charter to prescribe an alternative method for its amendment. She cites cases in which home rule powers were held to supersede state statutes. However, in State ex rel. Hinchcliffe v. Gibbons (1927), 116 Ohio St. 390, 156 N.E. 455, we resolved a conflict between charter provisions and constitutional procedures for amending a charter in favor of the constitutional provisions. In that case, the Cleveland City Charter provided for the filing of petitions proposing charter amendments with the "election authorities," whereas Section 9 of Article XVIII requires submission to the municipal legislative authority. We held:
116 Ohio St. at 395, 156 N.E. at 457.
We affirm this conclusion. Section 7 of Article XVIII authorizes municipal corporations to adopt and amend a charter, and Sections 8 and 9 of Article XVIII prescribe the procedures for adopting and amending a charter. None of these sections authorizes alternative procedures to be adopted by charter. Moreover, we have stated on other occasions that home rule authority granted under Section 3 of Article XVIII is subject to other provisions of the Constitution. Bazell v. Cincinnati (1968), 13 Ohio St.2d 63, 42 O.O.2d 137, 233 N.E.2d 864, paragraph one of the syllabus; Billings v. Cleveland Ry. Co. (1915), 92 Ohio St. 478, 484, 111 N.E. 155, 156.
Relator also argues that the charter and constitutional provisions are not in conflict. However, the charter clearly requires submission of a proposed charter amendment to the electors at a general or regular municipal election and Sections 8 and 9 of Article XVIII require submission between sixty and one hundred twenty days after passage of the certifying ordinance if no...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Beiersdorfer v. Larose
... ... initiative process to pass county charters and municipal ... ordinances ... of elections to "prescreen" proposed initiatives to ... ensure compliance with state law. For proposed county-charter ... art. X, § 3; see also State ex rel. Walker v ... Husted , 43 N.E.3d 419, 425 ... Bd ... of Elections of Cuyahoga Cnty ., 255 N.E.2d 880, 881 ... (Ohio Com ... (quoting State ex rel. Semik v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of ... Elections , ... ...
-
City of Athens v. McClain
... ... Association, and International City/County Management Association. Zaino, Hall & Farrin, ... the portion of the law that allows the state to retain .5 percent of the collected taxes as a ... , 605, 693 N.E.2d 212 (1998), citing State ex rel. Zielonka v. Carrel , 99 Ohio St. 220, 227, 124 ... Buckeye Community Hope Found. v. Cuyahoga Falls , 82 Ohio St.3d 539, 541, 697 N.E.2d 181 ... Id. ; State ex rel. Semik v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections , 67 Ohio ... ...
-
State ex rel. Twitchell v. Saferin
... ... Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and John A. Borell, Kevin A. Pituch, and Evy M ... a writ of mandamus to compel respondent Lucas County Board of Elections 1 to place a proposed charter amendment on the November 6, 2018 ... Hazel v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections , 80 Ohio St.3d 165, 168, 685 N.E.2d 224 (1997). { ... Semik v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections , 67 Ohio St.3d 334, 337, 617 N.E.2d ... ...
-
Beiersdorfer v. LaRose
... ... Attorney General - Constitutional Offices State of Ohio, Nick A. Soulas, Jr., Timothy A ... of the Prosecuting Attorney - Franklin County, Columbus, OH, Michael K. Lyons, Office of the ... as members of the Lucas County Board of Elections, filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings ... of a municipal government." State ex rel. Maxcy v. Saferin , 155 Ohio St.3d 496, 122 ... State ex rel. Semik v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections , 67 Ohio ... ...