State, ex rel. Sobczak v. Skow
Decision Date | 07 February 1990 |
Docket Number | No. 89-3,89-3 |
Citation | 49 Ohio St.3d 13,550 N.E.2d 455 |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Parties | The STATE, ex rel. SOBCZAK, Appellant, v. SKOW, Judge, et al., Appellees. |
Schuller, Meyer & Elder, James L. Schuller and Gregory R. Elder, Toledo, for appellant.
Anthony G. Pizza, Pros. Atty., Steven J. Papadimos and Daniel J. McCormick, for appellees.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a mandamus action by the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. Relator-appellant, Richard Sobczak, is the defendant in Jazweicki et al. v. Sobczak, case No. 88-0468 (the "Jazweicki case"), which is pending before Judge Robert Christiansen, one of respondents-appellees, the Judges of the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County. Pursuant to that action, Sobczak propounded thirty-eight interrogatories and several requests for production of documents. The plaintiffs did not respond.
On Sobczak's motion to compel discovery, Judge Christiansen ordered a response, but only to the first thirty-five interrogatories and the production requests. Judge Christiansen's order was based on Rule 7.18 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County, which provides, in part:
Thereafter, Sobczak sought the instant writ of mandamus in the court of appeals. Arguing that the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure prevented common pleas courts from promulgating rules that limited discovery, Sobczak asked that Judge Christiansen be directed to compel answers to all the interrogatories propounded in the Jazweicki case. However, the appellate court, finding that Sobczak's suit was essentially an attempt to appeal an interlocutory discovery order, dismissed the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
In reaching this result, the court of appeals relied on State, ex rel. Daggett, v. Gessaman (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 55, 63 O.O.2d 88, 295 N.E.2d 659. In Gessaman, we affirmed an appellate court's decision dismissing a complaint in mandamus because the complaint urged review of a trial court's discovery ruling. Our decision was based on the principle...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
...affirmed dismissals pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) based upon the existence of an adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Sobczak v. Skow (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 13, 14, 550 N.E.2d 455, 456; State ex rel. Daggett v. Gessaman (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 55, 63 O.O.2d 88, 295 N.E.2d 659, paragraph three o......
-
State ex rel. Hummel v. Sadler
...affirmed dismissals pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) based upon the existence of an adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Sobczak v. Skow (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 13, 14, 550 N.E.2d 455, 456; State ex rel. Daggett v. Gessaman (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 55, 63 O.O.2d 88, 295 N.E.2d 659, paragraph three o......
-
State ex rel. v. Mayfield Hts.
...has affirmed dismissals pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) based upon the existence of an adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Sobczak v. Skow (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 13, 550 N.E.2d 455; State ex rel. Daggett v. Gessaman (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 55, 63 O.O.2d 88, 295 N.E.2d {¶ 7} Under the facts speci......
-
State ex rel. Mobarak v. Brown
... ... correctly determined that Mr. Mobarak had an adequate remedy ... at law which precludes relief in mandamus. See State ex ... rel Sobczak v. Skow, 49 Ohio St.3d 13, 14 (1990) ... (affirming a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) dismissal "based on the ... principle that mandamus cannot be used as a ... ...