State ex rel. Stearns v. Foxworthy
Citation | 45 N.W. 632,29 Neb. 341 |
Parties | STATE EX REL. STEARNS v. FOXWORTHY. |
Decision Date | 08 April 1890 |
Court | Supreme Court of Nebraska |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
1. Ballots cast at an election for justice of the peace in the third district of the city of Lincoln, containing the names of three persons, when but one person is to be elected to that office, are, under section 40, c. 26, Comp. St., void, and cannot be counted for any one for that office.
2. Extrinsic evidence cannot be received to explain or contradict such a ballot.
3. Ballots cast in said district for F., for the office of justice of the peace, are not invalidated as to him because they also contain the name of B. “for justice of the peace of the first district,” and that of C. “for justice of the peace of the second district.”
Quo warranto.R. D. Stearns, N. Z. Snell, A. S. Tibbetts, and W. J. Bryan, for plaintiff.
Chas. L. Hall and Adams, Lansing & Scott, for defendant.
This is an action of quo warranto, brought by R. D. Stearns, county attorney of Lancaster county, to oust the defendant from the office of justice of the peace of the third district of the city of Lincoln, and instate M. L. Easterday therein. The case is submitted to the court on the following stipulation of facts:
The following are copies of the exhibits attached to the stipulation:
It will be observed that in the Prohibition tickets for justice of the peace, S. J. Kent, S. S. Royce, and M. L. Easterday were voted for on the same ticket for precisely the same office, and indistinguishable from Easterday. In the case of State v. Howe, 44 N. W. Rep. 874, it was held that the city of Lincoln was entitled to three justices of the peace,--one to be elected from each of the three districts. Therefore, there was but one justice of the peace to be elected at the last general state election for the third district of said city, by the electors of said district. It is contended by the defendant that the 37 Prohibition votes were counted for Easterday in violation of section 40, c. 26, Comp. St., which provides that, “whenever a ballot shall contain a greater number of names for any one office than the number of persons required to fill that office, it shall be deemed fraudulent as to the whole of the names for that office, but no further, and shall be indorsed, ‘Rejected as to office of ______,’ and disposed of as hereinafter directed; and no ballot...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
School District No. 54 of Douglas County ex rel. Hogan v. Howell, 54
......The School District of Omaha in the County of Douglas, in the State of Nebraska, Intervener-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,. School District Number 66 of Douglas County, ......
- State ex rel. Stearns v. Foxworthy