State ex rel. Texas City Independent School Dist. v. La Marque Independent School Dist.
Decision Date | 14 May 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 12502,12502 |
Citation | 258 S.W.2d 384 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. TEXAS CITY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. et al. v. LA MARQUE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Godard & Dazey and William B. Dazey, both of Texas City, for appellant.
Levy & Levy, Adrian F. Levy, Sr., and Adrian F. Levy, Jr., Galveston, for appellee Galveston Independent School District.
Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Searls, William E. Davis, Jr., and Victor W. Bouldin, all of Houston, for appellee Dickinson Independent School District.
The State of Texas, on relation of the Board of Trustees of the Texas City Independent School District, and its members, filed this suit, in the nature of quo warranto to and mandamus against the La Marque, Dickinson, and Galveston Independent School Districts, and the members of their respective Boards of Trustees, in the District Court of Galveston County, Texas. The original petition was amended to include Galveston County's Board of School Trustees.
The petitioner prayed the Court to compel the County Board of School Trustees to act upon a petition offered to it, and to grant an annexation to Texas City Independent School District of certain areas, including parts of the La Marque, Dickinson, and Galveston Independent School Districts.
The La Marque Independent School District answered, and set up the fact that it had reached an agreement with the Texas City District, and took no part in the trial.
The Court held for the Defendants on all points, and denied the relief prayed for. From this decision the State of Texas, and the Texas City Independent School District, prosecute this appeal.
The trial court sat without a jury, and filed these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, in support of its judgment:
'Findings of Fact:
Court of Galveston County on January 11, 1905, and its boundaries were defined by said Commissioners' Court on May 1, 1911, to include 1254.45 acres out of the S. C. Bundick League;
'3. No boundary of the Galveston Independent School District has ever been contiguous to or in conflict with any boundary of the Texas City Independent School District;
'4. At a meeting of the County Board of School Trustees of Galveston County (sometimes in the record referred to as the County School Trustees of Galveston County and as the County Board of Education of Galveston County), hereinafter called County Board, held on December 18, 1937, the said County Board adopted a resolution to extend the territorial limits of Common School District No. 9 (Port Bolivar School District); the County Board further instructed its Secretary, Mrs. Kathleen Bradford Benson, then County School Superintendent of Galveston County, 'to look into the matter of the boundaries of other districts which might also have water areas added to them, viz.: Districts Nos. 1, 6, 11, 17, 21, and Texas City, if they so desired, and to write them similar notifications' to the one to be sent to the trustees of Common School District No. 9; (Common School District No. 17 was the La Marque School District and Common School District No. 21 was the San Leon School District.);
Court on February 6, 1939; and
Court on February 6, 1939;
Court declared that Galveston County Common School District No. 21 (San Leon) was duly consolidated with the Dickinson Independent School District, after which date the Dickinson Independent School District included within its boundaries all of the territory formerly within the boundaries of said Common School District No. 21, as defined in the order of October 15, 1938, mentioned in Paragraph 7 hereinabove, and the present common boundaries between the Dickinson Independent School District and the Texas City Independent School District are those defined in said order of October 15, 1938; and that portion of Moses Lake, Dollar Bay, and Galveston Bay, which was by said order, annexed to said Common School District No. 21, is now within the duly constituted boundaries of the said Dickinson Independent School District;
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cook v. Neill
...Central Education Agency, Tex.Civ.App. (1953), 256 S.W.2d 151, wr. ref. n. r. e.; State ex rel. Texas City Independent School Dist. v. La Marque Independent School Dist., Tex.Civ.App. (1953), 258 S.W.2d 384, wr. ref. n. r. e.; and, Erath County School Trustees v. Hico County Line Independen......
-
Nichols v. Aldine Independent School Dist.
...58 S.W.2d 5; Barber v. County Board of School Trustees, Tex.Civ.App., 43 S.W.2d 319; State ex rel. Texas City Independent School Dist. v. La Marque Independent School Dist., Tex.Civ.App., 258 S.W.2d 384, writ ref., n. r. e.; Higginbotham v. Concho County School Trustees, If we are mistaken ......
-
Neill v. Cook, 3597
...elect to appeal to the school authorities, who had no power to determine same. In State ex rel. Texas City Independent School Dist. v. LaMarque Independent School District, 258 S.W.2d 384, 389 (Ref.N.R.E.), cited by appellees, the Court of Civil Appeals did say that because appellant electe......
-
Grammer v. County School Trustees, Hardeman County, 6686
...213; Dorchester Independent School Dist. v. Allen, Tex.Civ.App., 239 S.W.2d 122; State ex rel. Texas City Independent School Dist. v. La Marque Independent School Dist., Tex.Civ.App., 258 S.W.2d 384; and Munday Independent School Dist. v. County Board of School Trustees of Knox County, Tex.......