State ex rel. Wagner v. McDowell

Decision Date31 March 1886
CitationState ex rel. Wagner v. McDowell, 19 Neb. 442, 27 N.W. 433 (Neb. 1886)
PartiesSTATE EX REL. WAGNER v. MCDOWELL.
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Mandamus.

N. K. Griggs, for relator.

S. McDowall, for respondent.

MAXWELL, C. J.

The conceded facts in this case are, substantially, as follows: The defendant is now, and every since the twentieth of April, 1885, has been, the mayor of the city of Beatrice, and the relator during that period has been city clerk; that at the time of the relator's election to said office no salary or compensation had been fixed for the services of the clerk. On the twenty-eighth of April, 1885, the city council of that city passed an ordinance, which was duly approved, fixing the salary at the sum of $300 per annum; and afterwards, in December, 1885, said council ordered a warrant to be drawn for the sum of $75, as the salary of said clerk for three months. A warrant in due form for said sum was presented to the defendant for his signature, but he refused to sign the same, basing his refusal upon the ground that at the time the relator was elected no salary or compensation had been provided for, and that the ordinance fixing the salary has been passed during the relator's term of office, and therefore in conflict with section 15 of chapter 14 of the Compiled Statutes, which provides that “the annual salaries of all officers shall be fixed by ordinance, not exceeding the following sums, respectively: the mayor, five hundred dollars; treasurer, three hundred dollars; each councilman, three hundred dollars; clerk, five hundred dollars,” etc.

Section 16, art. 3, of the constitution, provides that “the legislature shall never grant any extra compensation to any public officer, agent, servant, or contractor, after the services shall have been rendered or the contract entered into; nor shall the compensation of any public officer be increased or diminished...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • State ex rel. Dwyer v. Nolte
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 7 Junio 1943
    ... ... Supervisors, 7 W.Va. 661; Harper v. Board of ... Commissioners, 54 Okla. 545; James v. Duffy, ... 140 Ky. 604, 131 S.W. 489; State v. McDowell, 19 ... Neb. 442. (9) The General Assembly is vested with power to ... reorganize the office of the city treasurer in cities of ... 600,000 or ... ...
  • Watts v. City of Princeton
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 6 Diciembre 1911
    ...the same effect are the decisions of the courts of other jurisdictions. Wendell v. City of Brooklyn, supra; State of Nebraska ex rel. Wagner v. McDowell, 19 Neb. 442, 27 N. W. 433; Charles A. Goud v. City of Portland, supra. Upon this subject the Supreme Court of Nebraska in the case of Sta......
  • Watts v. City of Princeton
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 6 Diciembre 1911
    ... ... Boswell (1892), 4 Ind.App. 133, 30 N.E. 534; ... State, ex rel., v. Beil (1901), 157 Ind ... 25, 60 N.E. 672; Summers v. Board, ... City of Portland, ... supra; State, ex rel., v ... McDowell (1886), 19 Neb. 442, 27 N.W. 433 ...          Upon ... this ... ...
  • State v. McDowell
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 31 Marzo 1886
    ...27 N.W. 433 19 Neb. 442 THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, EX REL". WILLIAM A. WAGNER, v. S. MCDOWELL Supreme Court of NebraskaMarch 31, 1886 ...           ... ORIGINAL application for mandamus ...  \xC2" ... ...