State Ex Rel. Williams v. Whitman

Decision Date03 October 1933
Citation150 So. 136,116 Fla. 196
PartiesSTATE of Florida ex rel. J. Hod WILLIAMS, Appellant v. Alton B. WHITMAN et al., as Florida State Board of Dental Examiners, Appellees.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

A case of original jurisdiction--mandamus.

COUNSEL

R. J. Duff and Whitaker Brothers, all of Tampa, for appellant.

McKay, Withers & Ramsey, of Tampa, for appellees.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus.

On consideration of the motion, the court being advised of its opinion in the premises, and having considered briefs and arguments therein submitted by the respective parties, it is now ordered and adjudged that the motion to quash be, and the same is hereby, overruled and denied, and respondents are allowed fifteen days from this date in which to file answer, return, or other pleading as they may be advised.

It is so ordered.

DAVIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

ELLIS, J., not participating.

DISSENTING

BROWN, Justice (dissenting).

My ground of dissent is that in my opinion the nature of this case was such that the proper remedy was by writ of certiorari and not by mandamus.

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • State v. Jones
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • September 23, 1940
    ... ... See Analysis of Bank Night, Williams on Flexible Participation Lotteries, Ch. 12, §§ 207 to 214, pages 128 to 139. See, also, Id., Ch ... Waller, Del.Super., 5 A.2d 257; Little River Theatre Corp. v. State ex rel. Hodge, 135 Fla. 854, 185 So. 855; Barker v. State, 56 Ga.App. 705, 193 S.E. 605; Iris Amusement ... 902, Ann.Cas. 1916E, 371; State v. Simanton, 100 Mont. 292, 49 P.2d 981; State v. Whitman, 116 Fla. 196, 150 So. 136, 156 So. 705, 95 A.L. R. 1416; Cf. State v. O'Neil, 147 Ia. 513, 527, ... ...
  • Trybulski v. Bellows Falls Hydro-Elec. Corp.
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • May 13, 1941
    ... ... The premises of the petitioners lie in this State, abutting on the river, at some distance downstream from the dam. It is ... Lynch, 92 Colo. 102, 18 P.2d 907, 86 A.L.R. 907, 910; State ex rel. Williams v. Whitman, 116 Fla. 196, 150 So. 136, 156 So. 705, 95 A.L.R ... ...
  • State v. Jones
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • September 23, 1940
    ...163; State v. Longino, 109 Miss. 125, 67 So. 902, Ann.Cas. 1916E, 371; State v. Simanton, 100 Mont. 292, 49 P.2d 981; State v. Whitman, 116 Fla. 196, 150 So. 136, 156 So. 705, 95 A.L. R. 1416; Cf. State v. O'Neil, 147 Ia. 513, 527, 126 N.W. 454, 33 L.R.A.,N.S., 788 (specially concurring opi......
  • Ostrosky v. State of Alaska
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • August 28, 1990
    ...Id. at 820.21 Three state court decisions also address the issue of reliance on a lower court opinion. State ex rel. Williams v. Whitman, 116 Fla. 196, 156 So. 705 (1934); State v. Striggles, 202 Iowa 1318, 210 N.W. 137 (1926) (defendant not entitled to rely on decision of highest Iowa cour......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT