State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles, 99-1041.
Citation | 718 NE 2d 908,87 Ohio St.3d 184 |
Decision Date | 17 November 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 99-1041.,99-1041. |
Parties | THE STATE EX REL. WRIGHT, APPELLANT, v. REGISTRAR, OHIO BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES, APPELLEE. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
George W. Macdonald, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kenneth F. Affeldt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Per Curiam.
Wright asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his prohibition action. For the following reasons, Wright's claims are meritless.
In order to be entitled to a writ of prohibition, Wright had to establish that (1) the Registrar is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law, and (3) denial of the writ will cause injury to Wright for which no other adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law exists. State ex rel. White v. Junkin (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 335, 336, 686 N.E.2d 267, 268.
R.C. 4509.101(A)(3)(c) provides that whenever in accordance with rules adopted by the Registrar, the Registrar randomly selects a person who has been issued a license to operate a motor vehicle, that person must, upon request, verify the existence of proof of financial responsibility covering the operation of motor vehicle. Pursuant to R.C. 4509.101(A)(3)(c), the Registrar adopted Ohio Adm. Code 4501:1-2-08, which governs the random-selection suspension procedure and provides:
The Registrar had not exercised nor is he about to exercise quasi-judicial authority in issuing the suspension order against Wright pursuant to R.C. 4509.101(A)(3)(c) and Ohio Adm.Code 4501:1-2-08. Quasi-judicial authority is the power to hear and determine controversies between the public and individuals that require a hearing...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Schachter v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd.
...Brand v. Lindley (1980), 62 Ohio St.2d 133, 16 O.O.3d 150, 403 N.E.2d 996, syllabus; cf. State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 184, 186, 718 N.E.2d 908 authority is the power to hear and determine controversies between the public and individuals that requ......
-
ZUPP v. COLUMBUS Mun. CIVIL Serv. Comm'n
...Bd. of Elections, 119 Ohio St.3d 478, 2008-Ohio-5093, 895 N.E.2d 177, ¶ 16; State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 184, 186, 718 N.E.2d 908 (all determining that proceedings of administrative officers and agencies are not quasi-judicial unless the proceedi......
-
State ex rel. Internatl. Heat & Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers Local #3 v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2006 Ohio 274 (OH 1/20/2006), 85116.
... ... in State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. , 97 Ohio St. 3d 504, 2002-Ohio-6717, ... State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles, 87 Ohio St.3d 184, 185, ... ...
-
The State Ex Rel. Letohiovote.Org v. Brunner
...Cty. Bd. of Elections, 119 Ohio St.3d 478, 2008-Ohio-5093, 895 N.E.2d 177, ¶ 16, quoting State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 184, 186, 718 N.E.2d 908. {¶ 14} The secretary of state claims that she was authorized by R.C. 3501.05(N)(1) to investigate whet......