State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Valido, 95-2208

Decision Date15 November 1995
Docket NumberNo. 95-2208,95-2208
Citation662 So.2d 1012
Parties20 Fla. L. Weekly D2514 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Amanda VALIDO, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard A. Warren; South Miami, Chou & Granado, P.A., Coral Gables, for petitioner.

Diego C. Asencio; West Palm Beach, Jose M. Francisco, P.A., Miami, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent sued State Farm on a homeowner's policy for damages allegedly caused by hurricane Andrew and tropical storm Gordon. State Farm claimed that the home had sustained ordinary wear and tear which was not covered by the policy. In this proceeding for certiorari, we quash in its entirety an order of production upon the holdings that (a) State Farm's claim files, manuals, guidelines and documents concerning its claim handling procedures were irrelevant to the first party dispute involved in this case, see Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91 (Fla.1995); Fidelity & Cas. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Taylor, 525 So.2d 908, 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), rev. denied, 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1988), disapproved on other grounds, Kujawa v. Manhattan Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 541 So.2d 1168 (Fla.1989), and (b) the defendant's surveillance photographs, witness statements and repair estimates were protected by the work product privilege. See Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So.2d 108 (Fla.1970); Waste Management, Inc. of Florida v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 544 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Dade County School Bd. v. Soler, 534 So.2d 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Certiorari granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Homeowners Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avila, 3D17–465
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 25, 2018
    ...in a declaratory action to determine coverage, because the claims file is the insurer's work product"); State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Valido, 662 So.2d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (granting certiorari, quashing the trial court's discovery order "in its entirety," and holding that "(a) S......
  • Avatar Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jones
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 13, 2020
    ...So. 3d 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ; Nationwide Ins. Co. of Florida v. Demmo, 57 So. 3d 982 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) ; State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Valido, 662 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) ; State Farm Florida Ins. Co. v. Gallmon, 835 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). See also, State Farm Mut. Auto. ......
  • Avatar Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mitchell, 3D20-1515
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 13, 2021
    ...850 So. 2d 655, 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (noting photographs taken at accident scene were work-product); State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Valido, 662 So. 2d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (finding surveillance photographs "were protected by the work product privilege") (citations omitted); see al......
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Premier Diagnostic Ctrs., LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 27, 2016
    ...a trial court must not order an insurer to produce its claims files and other work product documents."); State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Valido, 662 So.2d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (concluding "[i]n this proceeding for certiorari, we quash in its entirety an order of production upon the h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT