State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nickerson

Citation216 S.W.3d 823
Decision Date22 December 2006
Docket NumberNo. 04-0427.,04-0427.
PartiesSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Teresa NICKERSON, Respondent.
CourtSupreme Court of Texas

Michelle E. Robberson, Steven Dillon Roberts, Mark Anthony Teague, R. Brent Cooper, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Dallas, for petitioner.

Jesse L. Nickerson III, Nickerson Law Office, James R. Rodgers, The Moore Law Firm, Paris, for respondent.

J. Wade Birdwell, Wallach, Andrews & Stouffer, P.C., Fort Worth, for Amicus Curiae Judith Moss, D.O.

Chief Justice JEFFERSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

The issue in this case is whether an insured can recover attorney's fees under Chapter 38 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code from her underinsured motorist (UIM) insurer.

Teresa Nickerson was injured in an automobile collision with Calvin Christopher. Nickerson sued Christopher, but she released her claims against him after accepting a $25,000 payment representing the limits of Christopher's insurance policy. Nickerson also accepted a $10,000 payment of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits from State Farm. Believing her damages to be greater than Christopher's policy limits, Nickerson sued State Farm to recover under the UIM provision of her policy, which had a $300,000 limit. At trial, Nickerson sought to establish Christopher's liability and recover attorney's fees under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code subsections 38.001 and 38.002.

On November 13, 2002, a jury found that Christopher's negligence proximately caused Nickerson's damages and awarded her $225,000 in actual damages and $46,500 in attorney's fees incurred during trial. On December 4, 2002, State Farm paid Nickerson $191,294.52, representing the actual damages ($225,000), minus offsets ($35,000), plus interest on $190,000 at a rate of ten percent simple interest from November 13, 2002, through December 4, 2002. The trial court signed a final judgment on December 6, 2002, finding that Nickerson was entitled to actual damages of $225,000 plus prejudgment interest of $181,849.32 accruing from the date suit was filed until the day prior to judgment. Based on these findings it awarded Nickerson $300,000, the limit of her UIM policy. Additionally, the trial court awarded Nickerson $46,500 in attorney's fees and postjudgment interest.

On appeal, State Farm initially challenged both the attorney's fees and pre-judgment interest awards, but later withdrew the prejudgment interest issue, and on November 18, 2004, paid the remainder of the UIM policy limit of $300,000. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 19 d4 Novembro d4 2020
    ...of the claim requires the rendition of such a judgment. 216 S.W.3d 809, 818–19 (Tex. 2006) ; see also State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Nickerson , 216 S.W.3d 823, 824 (Tex. 2006) ; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Norris , 216 S.W.3d 819, 822–23 (Tex. 2006). In so holding, the presentment analysi......
  • In re Farmers Tex. Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 31 d2 Agosto d2 2021
    ... ... proceeding was filed. See In re State Farm Mut. Auto ... Ins. , Nos. 19-0791 &19-0792, 2021 WL 1045651, ... , 216 S.W.3d 809, 818 ... (Tex. 2007); State Farm v. Nickerson , 216 S.W.3d ... 823, 824 (Tex. 2006); Henson v. S. Farm Bur. Cas ... ...
  • In re Germania Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 23 d1 Abril d1 2018
    ...insurance coverage is deficient. See Brainard v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co., 216 S.W.3d 809, 818 (Tex. 2007); State Farm v. Nickerson, 216 S.W.3d 823, 824 (Tex. 2006); Henson v. S. Farm Bur. Cas. Ins. Co., 17 S.W.3d 652, 654 (Tex. 2000); In re Liberty Cty. Mut. Ins. Co., 537 S.W.3d 214, 220......
  • In re Liberty Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 5 d4 Outubro d4 2017
    ...and (4) that the underinsured motorist's insurance coverage is deficient. See Brainard 216 S.W.3d 809 at 818 ; State Farm v. Nickerson , 216 S.W.3d 823, 824 (Tex. 2006) ; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Norris , 216 S.W.3d 819, 822-23 (Tex. 2006) ; Henson , 17 S.W.3d at 654 ; In re Progre......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT