State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Jones
Citation | 248 Ga. 46,280 S.E.2d 837 |
Decision Date | 07 July 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 36989,36989 |
Parties | STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JONES. |
Court | Supreme Court of Georgia |
James E. Humes, II, A. J. Land, Hatcher, Stubbs, Land, Hollis & Rothschild, Columbus, and Luhr G. C. Beckmann, Jr., Andrew J. Hill, III, Savannah, for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.
James E. Butler, Jr., Columbus, amicus: Don C. Keenan, Atlanta, and Charles R. Ashman, Savannah, for Jones.
After further consideration, we have concluded that the writ of certiorari in this case was improvidently granted, and it is therefore dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
Opinion below, 156 Ga.App. 230, 274 S.E.2d 623.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bates
...extraordinary motion for rehearing were denied on July 23, 1981, and July 31, 1981, respectively. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Jones, 248 Ga. 46, 280 S.E.2d 837 (1981). The Jones decision, and the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case, proved a clarion call to countl......
-
State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Sweat
...certiorari, and heard oral argument. However, on July 17, 1981, it dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted. 248 Ga. 46, 280 S.E.2d 837 (1981). Following the announcement of the Court of Appeals decision in Jones, other post-accident insureds who had exhausted (or were abou......
-
Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Anderson
... ... 76 A.L.R.Fed. 511 ... COTTON STATES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, ... Pratt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for State ... Appeal from the United ... the Georgia Court of Appeals' decision in Jones v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., 156 ... ...
-
Atlanta Cas. Co. v. Flewellen
...State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 156 Ga.App. 230, 274 S.E.2d 623 (1980); Writ of Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted, 248 Ga. 46, 280 S.E.2d 837 (1981). As recognized by the majority, the issues in this case are controlled by the decision of this court in Jones, and it is only by o......