State of Oklahoma v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COM'N
Decision Date | 18 January 1946 |
Docket Number | No. 3203.,3203. |
Citation | 153 F.2d 280 |
Parties | STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Randell S. Cobb, Atty. Gen. (Mainard Kennerly, Asst. Atty. Gen., on the brief) for appellant.
Joseph M. Friedman, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen. (John F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lawrence V. Meloy, Charles E. P. Crawley, attorneys, Civil Service Commission, and Robert Mandel, attorney, Department of Justice, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.
Section 12(a) of the Hatch Political Activity Act, as amended, 53 Stat. 1147, 54 Stat. 767, 18 U.S.C.A. § 61l(a), in presently material part, provides, "No officer or employee of any State or local agency whose principal employment is in connection with any activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or by any Federal agency shall * * * take any active part in political management or in political campaigns." The applicable part of Section 12(b) provides, And the pertinent part of section 12(c) provides, * * *"
The United States Civil Service Commission filed a letter of charges against France Paris and the State of Oklahoma in which it was charged that Paris, while chairman of the Democratic State Central Committee in Oklahoma, a political party office, held the office of a member of the Highway Commission of Oklahoma, an activity financed in part by loans and grants made by the United States and by a Federal agency thereof; that he was active in the political management of the Democratic Party; and that he assisted in the raising of funds on behalf of such party and in the giving of a banquet. Paris and the State filed separate answers, and a stipulation of facts was filed. It was stipulated that in February, 1942, Paris was elected chairman of the Democratic State Central Committee for his third term, and occupied such position until October, 1943, when he resigned; that he was appointed as a member of the State Highway Commission in January, 1943, and had held the position continuously since; that the activities of the highway department were financed in part by grants made by the Public Roads Administration of the United States; that a Victory Dinner was held in Oklahoma City in June, 1943, for the purpose of raising funds for the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic State Committee; that the dinner netted the Democratic Party approximately $30,000; that it was under the general supervision of the governor of the state; that the details were handled by a committee appointed by the governor; that Paris was an ex officio member of the committee and advised with the governor and the committee concerning the dinner but was not active in planning and arranging it; that at the dinner, he called the meeting to order and introduced the toastmaster; that employees of the highway department received mimeographed sheets soliciting them to purchase tickets for the dinner at suggested prices, ranging from $5.00 to $25.00; that an employee of the highway department acted as treasurer of the funds received from the sales of tickets for the dinner; that such employee also kept books for the Democratic Party in the state; that about ten days before being appointed as a member of the highway commission, Paris closed the state headquarters of the Democratic State Central Committee; that they were later opened under the direct charge of the vice-chairman of the committee; and that the principal activity of the committee during 1943 was in connection with the Victory Dinner. Upon the stipulated facts, the Commission found and concluded that the service of Paris as chairman of the Democratic State Central Committee while a member of the State Highway Commission,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State of Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission
...Service Commission and this action was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. State of Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission, 153 F.2d 280. Certiorari was sought and allowed because of the importance of the issues involved in the administration of justi......
-
Newton v. F.A.A.
...title is merely an aid to construction, which must yield to unambiguous statutory language, see State of Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission, 153 F.2d 280, 283 (10th Cir. 1946), we should not close our eyes to the likelihood that a Member of Congress reading the title of the ......
-
U.S. v. Gill
...United States v. Dillenbeck, No. 4:07-cr213-RBH, 2007 WL 2684838, at *2 (D.S.C. Sept.7, 2007). 36. Id. 37. State of Okla. v. U.S. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 153 F.2d 280, 283 (10th Cir.1946). 38. 152 CONG, REC. S8012, 8013 (daily ed. July 20, 2006) (statement of Sen. 39. http://www.nsopr.gov/. 40.......
-
In re Ramshaw
...and law as found by the Commission to determine whether the Commission has abused its discretion. State of Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission, (10 Cir., 1946), 153 F.2d 280; affirmed, 330 U.S. 127, 67 S. Ct. 544, 91 L.Ed. 794; State of Utah v. United States, et al., (10 Cir.......
-
No lie about it, the perjury sentencing guidelines must change.
...279-80. (99.) See supra Part II.B. (100.) Glover, 52 F.3d at 287. (101.) Id. at 286 (citing Oklahoma v. United States Civil Serv. Comm'n, 153 F.2d 280, 283 (10th Cir. 1946), aff'd, 330 U.S. 127 (102.) Id. (103.) United States v. Bova, 350 F.3d 224, 230 (1st Cir. 2003). (104.) United States ......