State Of Wash. v. Grogan
Decision Date | 02 June 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 82609-9.,82609-9. |
Citation | 234 P.3d 169,168 Wash.2d 1039 |
Parties | STATE of Washington, Respondent,v.Clifford James GROGAN, Petitioner. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Prior report: 147 Wash.App. 511, 195 P.3d 1017.
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its June 1, 2010, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Three for reconsideration in light of Supreme Court No. 81243-8- State of Washington v. Keith Ian Dow, 168 Wash.2d 243, 227 P.3d 1278 (2010).
/s/ Madsen, C.J.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Fed. Way Sch. Dist. No. 210 v. Vinson
-
State v. Cardenas-Flores
...her of second degree assault of a child.4 Cardenas–Flores also asserts that our Supreme Court's remand order in State v. Grogan , 168 Wash.2d 1039, 234 P.3d 169 (2010) suggests that Dow had overturned prior Court of Appeals precedent that held a defendant must object to the admission of sta......
-
State v. Cardenas-Flores
...App. at 519, 195 P.3d 1017. This court then accepted review and remanded for reconsideration in light of Dow . Order, State v. Grogan , No. 82609-9 (Wash. June 2, 2010). On remand, the Court of Appeals properly entertained the defendant's corpus delicti challenge. Grogan II, 158 Wash. App. ......
-
State v. Gasteazoro–Paniagua
...Pierce, 169 Wash.App. 533, 544, 280 P.3d 1158 (citing State v. Grogan, 147 Wash.App. 511, 516, 195 P.3d 1017 (2008), remanded,168 Wash.2d 1039, 234 P.3d 169 (2010)), review denied,No. 87766–1, 175 Wash.2d 1025, 291 P.3d 253 (Wash. Dec. 4, 2012). Unchallenged findings of fact are verities on......