State Of Wash. v. Grogan

Decision Date02 June 2010
Docket NumberNo. 82609-9.,82609-9.
Citation234 P.3d 169,168 Wash.2d 1039
PartiesSTATE of Washington, Respondent,v.Clifford James GROGAN, Petitioner.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Prior report: 147 Wash.App. 511, 195 P.3d 1017.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its June 1, 2010, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Three for reconsideration in light of Supreme Court No. 81243-8- State of Washington v. Keith Ian Dow, 168 Wash.2d 243, 227 P.3d 1278 (2010).

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Fed. Way Sch. Dist. No. 210 v. Vinson
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 29 Septiembre 2011
  • State v. Cardenas-Flores
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 14 Junio 2016
    ...her of second degree assault of a child.4 Cardenas–Flores also asserts that our Supreme Court's remand order in State v. Grogan , 168 Wash.2d 1039, 234 P.3d 169 (2010) suggests that Dow had overturned prior Court of Appeals precedent that held a defendant must object to the admission of sta......
  • State v. Cardenas-Flores
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 17 Agosto 2017
    ...App. at 519, 195 P.3d 1017. This court then accepted review and remanded for reconsideration in light of Dow . Order, State v. Grogan , No. 82609-9 (Wash. June 2, 2010). On remand, the Court of Appeals properly entertained the defendant's corpus delicti challenge. Grogan II, 158 Wash. App. ......
  • State  v. Gasteazoro–Paniagua
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 20 Febrero 2013
    ...Pierce, 169 Wash.App. 533, 544, 280 P.3d 1158 (citing State v. Grogan, 147 Wash.App. 511, 516, 195 P.3d 1017 (2008), remanded,168 Wash.2d 1039, 234 P.3d 169 (2010)), review denied,No. 87766–1, 175 Wash.2d 1025, 291 P.3d 253 (Wash. Dec. 4, 2012). Unchallenged findings of fact are verities on......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT