State v. Abney, 2010-UP-414
Decision Date | 20 September 2010 |
Docket Number | 2010-UP-414 |
Parties | The State, Respondent, v. Horace Abney, Jr., Appellant. |
Court | South Carolina Court of Appeals |
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Submitted September 1, 2010
Appeal From Greenville County C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Horace Abney, Jr. appeals his conviction for trafficking cocaine and thirty-year sentence, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial and motion to dismiss pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers [1] (IAD). We affirm [2] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:
1. As to whether the trial court erred in denying Abney's new trial motion: State v. Garrett, 350 S.C. 613, 619, 567 S.E.2d 523, 526 (Ct. App. 2002) ( ); State v. Williams, 292 S.C. 231, 232, 355 S.E.2d 861, 862 (1987) (a defendant in his absence is subject to a harmless error analysis) an error in trying ; see also State v. Shuler, 344 S.C. 604, 626, 545 S.E.2d 805, 816 (2001) ( ).
2. As to whether the trial court erred in denying Abney's motion to dismiss pursuant to the IAD: Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716, 725 (1985) ().
AFFIRMED.
---------
Notes:
[1] S.C. Code Ann. § 17-11-10 (2003).
[2] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial