State v. Aby, 42651
| Decision Date | 08 January 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 42651,42651 |
| Citation | 205 Neb. 267,287 N.W.2d 68 |
| Parties | STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Charles A. ABY, Appellant. |
| Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. Criminal Law: Witnesses: Evidence: Sexual Assault. The testimony of the prosecutrix alone, uncorroborated by any other evidence, is not sufficient to sustain a conviction for sexual assault.
2. Criminal Law: Evidence: Sexual Assault. Corroboration as to material facts and circumstances is sufficient and evidence that a complaint was made after the offense is admissible.
3. Criminal Law: Lesser-Included Offenses: Words and Phrases. A lesser-included offense is one which includes some of the elements of the crime charged without the addition of any element irrelevant to the crime charged.
4. Criminal Law: Lesser-Included Offenses: Informations and Indictments. A crime and a lesser-included offense may be charged in separate counts of the same information.
5. Criminal Law: Lesser-Included Offenses: Convictions. A defendant cannot be convicted of two degrees of the same offense or a crime and a lesser-included offense based upon the same act or transaction. A conviction or acquittal of the principal offense bars any prosecution or punishment for a lesser-included offense.
George E. Brugh, York, for appellant.
Paul L. Douglas, Atty. Gen., and Linda A. Akers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, for appellee.
Heard before KRIVOSHA, C. J., and BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, CLINTON, BRODKEY, WHITE and HASTINGS, JJ.
After trial to the court the defendant was convicted of first degree sexual assault and felony debauching of a minor. He was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment on the first count and 2 years imprisonment on the second count, the sentences to run concurrently. He has appealed and contends the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction; the State should have been required to elect between the counts because count II was a lesser-included offense of the crime charged in count I; and the sentences are excessive.
The record shows that the defendant is 33 years of age. On October 22, 1976, he married Peggy Gibbs who had two children by a previous marriage, a son and a daughter. Mrs. Gibbs was employed by the Farmers Co-Op in York, Nebraska. On August 16, 1977, Mrs. Gibbs attended a seminar in Hutchinson, Kansas, as a part of the duties of her employment. While she was away from York, Nebraska, she left the children at home in the care of the defendant.
On the night of August 17, 1977, while Mrs. Gibbs was away, the defendant entered the bedroom of Mrs. Gibbs' daughter, who was then 10 years of age, and committed the offenses charged in the information. It is unnecessary to recite the details of the offenses here which were testified to in detail by the victim.
Mrs. Gibbs and the defendant separated on October 8, 1977, several weeks before she petitioned for the dissolution of their marriage.
During the last week in November 1977, Mrs. Gibbs received a telephone call from a friend. She immediately questioned her daughter, who related what the defendant had done to her.
On December 3, 1977, Mrs. Gibbs contacted the sheriff's office. The complaint was then investigated by a state patrolman and the victim was interviewed by a clinical psychologist. As a result of the investigation a complaint against the defendant was filed on December 14, 1977.
The defendant had left York, Nebraska, on or about November 30, 1977, shortly after he learned that charges would be filed against him. He went to California and used an assumed name. He was apprehended and returned to Nebraska in May 1978.
The defendant's principal contention is that there was insufficient corroboration for the testimony of the victim. The rule is that the testimony of the prosecutrix alone, uncorroborated by any other evidence, is not sufficient to sustain a conviction for sexual assault. State v. Fisher, 190 Neb. 742, 212 N.W.2d 568. Corroboration as to material facts and circumstances is sufficient and evidence that a complaint was made after the offense is admissible. Texter v. State, 170 Neb. 426, 102 N.W.2d 655.
The evidence shows that the victim did not immediately complain to her mother when Mrs. Gibbs returned from Kansas because she was afraid and ashamed of what had happened to her. However, when she was asked about the incident she told her mother what had happened. During subsequent interviews with the state patrolman and the psychologist she related the details of the incident. The testimony of the psychologist tends to corroborate...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Reeves
...(1986); State v. Suffredini, 224 Neb. 220, 397 N.W.2d 51 (1986); State v. Menard, 199 Neb. 456, 259 N.W.2d 479 (1977); State v. Aby, 205 Neb. 267, 287 N.W.2d 68 (1980). See generally, Annot., 96 A.L.R.2d 768 (1964). This wide latitude should not be circumscribed in capital cases, where the ......
-
People v. Devin, 53175
...632; Commonwealth v. Franks (1977), 372 Mass. 866, 362 N.E.2d 895; Williamson v. State (Miss.1980), 388 So.2d 168; State v. Aby (1980), 205 Neb. 267, 287 N.W.2d 68; Lucas v. State (1980), 96 Nev. [93 Ill.2d 352] 428, 610 P.2d 727; State v. Marzolf (1979), 79 N.J. 167, 398 A.2d 849; State v.......
-
Fitzgerald v. United States
...states, Idaho and Nebraska, still require corroboration in all sexual assault cases. See Idaho Code § 18-6101 (1979); State v. Aby, 205 Neb. 267, 287 N.W.2d 68 (1980). Seven jurisdictions (including the District of Columbia) require corroboration only in certain limited factual circumstance......
-
State v. Lovelace
... ... Aby, 205 Neb. 267, 287 N.W.2d 68 (1980), to the effect that a conviction or acquittal of the principal offense bars any prosecution or punishment for a ... ...