State v. Ackerman
Decision Date | 24 November 1908 |
Citation | 113 S.W. 1087,214 Mo. 325 |
Parties | STATE v. ACKERMAN. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Henry County; C. A. Denton, Judge.
Clarence Ackerman was charged with perjury. A motion to quash the indictment was sustained, and the state appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Herbert S. Hadley, Atty. Gen., and Frank Blake, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
On September 13, 1907, the grand jury of Henry county, Mo., returned an indictment against the defendant charging him with having committed willful and corrupt perjury by testifying falsely in a proceeding before the grand jury of said county on the 12th of September, 1907. The defendant filed a motion to quash the indictment, which was sustained by the court, and a motion for new trial was overruled and appeal granted to the state. The indictment is in the following form:
The defendant is not represented in this court by counsel, and we must look to the grounds assigned in the motion to quash as the basis of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Brinkley, 39484.
......H and I.R.S. 1939, sec. 4272; State v. Thornton, 245 Mo. 436, 150 S.W. 1048; Kelly's Criminal Law (3 Ed.), sec. 824; State v. Faulkner, 175 Mo. 545, 76 S.W. 116; State v. Ackerman, 214 Mo. 325, 113 S.W. 1087; State v. Hardiman, 277 Mo. 229, 209 S.W. 879; Wharton, Criminal Law (12 Ed.), sec. 1542. (29) Where the materiality of defendant's testimony is interwoven with determination of factual issues on the case, the question of materiality must be submitted to the jury with ......
-
State v. Brinkley
...... assignments of perjury on immaterial matters, and in refusing. requested instructions G, H and I.R.S. 1939, sec. 4272;. State v. Thornton, 245 Mo. 436, 150 S.W. 1048;. Kelly's Criminal Law (3 Ed.), sec. 824; State v. Faulkner, 175 Mo. 545, 76 S.W. 116; State v. Ackerman, 214 Mo. 325, 113 S.W. 1087; State v. Hardiman, 277 Mo. 229, 209 S.W. 879; Wharton, Criminal. Law (12 Ed.), sec. 1542. (29) Where the materiality of. defendant's testimony is interwoven with determination of. factual issues on the case, the question of materiality must. be submitted to the ......
-
State v. Clinkingbeard
......666, 39. L.R.A. (N.S.) 385; Teague v. Commonwealth, 189 S.W. 909, L.R.A. 1917B, 738; State v. Tedder, 242 S.W. 893; State v. Ruddy, 228 S.W. 762; State v. Jennings, 278 Mo. 552; State v. Hardiman, 277. Mo. 233; State v. Moran, 216 Mo. 550; State v. Ackerman, 214 Mo. 332; State v. Smith, 119. Minn. 107; People v. Albers, 137 Mich. 679;. State v. Caywood, 96 Iowa 372; State v. Cary, 159 Ind. 504. (2) After defendant's demurrer. offered at the close of State's case was overruled, the. appellant proceeded to offer testimony in support of ......
-
The State v. Tedder
...and cases cited; State v. Hardiman, 277 Mo. l. c. 229, 209 S.W. l. c. 879; State v. Moran, 216 Mo. 550, 115 S.W. 1126; State v. Ackerman, 214 Mo. l. c. 325, 113 S.W. 1087; State v. Day, 100 Mo. l. c. 242, 12 S.W. State v. Wakefield, 73 Mo. 549.] In view of the foregoing, the plea of former ......