State v. Aguilar
| Decision Date | 20 July 1995 |
| Citation | 899 P.2d 690,321 Or. 378 |
| Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Jenaro AGUILAR, Petitioner on Review. CC C88-06-33882; CA A70129; SC S41243. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Liza Langford, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.
No appearance contra.
Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, UNIS and GRABER, JJ. **
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of State v. Dominguez-Martinez, 321 Or. 206, 895 P.2d 306 (1995).
* Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Janice R. Wilson, Judge. 126 Or.App. 22, 867 P.2d 520 (1994).
** Durham, J., did not participate in this decision.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Aguilar
...court's denial of the motion, 126 Or.App. 22, 867 P.2d 520 (1994). The Supreme Court has remanded for reconsideration, State v. Aguilar, 321 Or. 378, 899 P.2d 690 (1995), in the light of State v. Dominguez-Martinez, 321 Or. 206, 895 P.2d 306 (1995). We reverse and On June 4, 1988, Officer K......
-
State v. Foster
...... Before trial, defendant moved to suppress the evidence discovered during the search of the car. The trial court found that Skinner asked for defendant's consent to search the car because he was aware of Thompson's drug conviction and, relying on our opinion in State v. Aguilar, [139 Or.App. 306] 126 Or.App. 22, 867 P.2d 520 (1994), 1 denied defendant's motion to suppress. Following a trial on stipulated facts, defendant was found guilty of possessing a controlled substance. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred by not suppressing the ......
- State v. Claxton