State v. Albertalli

Decision Date05 March 1915
CitationState v. Albertalli, 112 A. 724 (N.J. 1915)
PartiesSTATE v. ALBERTALLI.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Error to Court of Quarter Sessions, Hudson County.

Henry Albertalli was convicted of assault and battery with an automobile on the person of another, and he brings error. Judgment reversed.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of an atrocious assault and battery with an automobile upon the person of George C. Poeschel, committed April 27, 1913, between 7 and 8 o'clock in the evening. Prior to his indictment, the defendant was convicted in the recorder's court of North Bergen of driving his automobile upon the boulevard on the evening of April 27, 1913, between the hours of 7 and 8 p. m., at an unreasonable rate of speed, without regard to traffic and the use of highways, thereby endangering the life, limbs, and property of George Poeschel, in violation of subdivision 4 of section 23 of the Motor Vehicle Act (3 Comp. St 1910, p. 3436).

The plaintiff! in error entered a plea of autrefois convict, and the court sustained the prosecutor's demurrer. The trial then proceeded, and the jury brought in a verdict of guilty with a recommendation for mercy.

Argued November Term, 1914, before GUMMERE, C. J., and GARRISON and MINTURN, JJ.

John Warren, of Jersey City, for plaintiff in error.

Robert S. Hudspeth, of Jersey City, for the State.

PER CURIAM. The judgment in this case must be reversed for the following misdirection to the jury:

"To put it in another way: If you find that the defendant was so running his car at the time of the accident that a reasonably prudent man would not run his car in the same way, and that therefore this accident occurred, then you have a right to infer that he intended to commit this assault and battery which actually was committed upon this complaining witness."

This permitted the jury to find the defendant guilty of the crime charged if the accident happened from the negligent...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • State v. Currie
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • February 17, 1964
    ...a crime involving a death and a mere violation of a traffic statute.' 23 N.J., at p. 169, 128 A.2d at p. 491. See State v. Albertalli, 112 A. 724, 725 (N.J.Sup.Ct.1915); State v. Williams, 21 N.J.Misc. 329, 330, 34 A.2d 141; (Recorder's Ct. 1943); cf. State v. Francis, 67 N.J.Super. 377, 38......
  • State v. Van Landuyt
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • March 31, 1978
    ...fact situation." 137 N.J.Super. at 54, 347 A.2d at 797. See also, State v. Shoopman, 11 N.J. 333, 94 A.2d 493 (1953); State v. Albertalli, 112 A. 724 (N.J.Sup.Ct.1915). The recent United States Supreme Court decision Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 97 [385 A.2d 239] S.Ct. 2221, 53 L.Ed.2d 187 ......
  • State v. Wynn
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • March 26, 1956
    ...to determine what part of a contradictory charge is correct. State v. Sahazian, 98 N.J.L. 430, 119 A. 780 (Sup.Ct.1923); State v. Albertalli, 112 A. 724 (Sup.Ct.1915). Where the life of an accused is at stake, it is too risky to determine what the instructions in this case could mean to the......
  • State v. Shoopman
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • June 20, 1952
    ...necessarily the result of such prohibited acts, may likewise be punished as a separate and distinct offense.' See also State v. Albertalli, 112 A. 724 N.J. (Sup.Ct.1915); People v. Wilson, 193 Cal. 512, 226 P. 5 (Sup.Ct.1924); Commonwealth v. Maguire, 313 Mass. 669, 48 N.E.2d 665 (Sup.Jud.C......
  • Get Started for Free