State v. Allen

Decision Date25 February 1896
Citation14 Wash. 103,44 P. 121
PartiesSTATE v. ALLEN.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Appeal from superior court, Spokane county; Norman Buck, Judge.

William Allen was convicted of selling imitation dairy products contrary to law, and appeals. Reversed.

Dunbar J., dissenting.

W. A Lewis, for appellant.

J. W Feighan, for the State.

HOYT C.J.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of section 34 of the act of March 2, 1891 (Pen. Code, § 242). This section was in the following language: "No person or persons shall sell supply, or offer for sale or exchange any oleaginous substance, or any compound of the same, purporting to be butter or cheese, or having the semblance of butter or cheese, other than that produced from wholesome and unadulterated milk, or cream of the same, unless the said oleaginous substance, and the package containing the same, shall be marked so as to plainly indicate its true character and distinguish it from pure and genuine dairy products; and in any public dining or eating room where imitation dairy product or products are commonly or knowingly used as an article of food, the bill of fare used in such dining or eating room shall state the fact in the same sized type as is used in printing the body of said bill of fare; or if no bill of fare is used, then, in a conspicuous place of said dining or eating room, easily seen by any one entering said room, shall be posted a notice stating the name or names of such imitation dairy products: provided, that the addition of harmless coloring matter to any product manufactured from pure, unadulterated milk, or the cream thereof, shall (not) come within the provisions of this act: provided further, that milk drawn from cows within fifteen days before and five days after parturition shall be construed to be unclean, impure and unwholesome. Any person violating any of the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars, or by not less than one month nor more than three months' imprisonment in the county jail, or by both such fine and imprisonment." Pending an appeal from the judgment and sentence, the legislature passed the act of March 11, 1895, of which section 5 was in the following language: "No person, by himself, his agents or his servants, shall render or manufacture, sell, offer for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Palermo v. City of Bonney Lake
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 3 de setembro de 2008
    ...Statutory Construction § 286(166) (2d ed.1904); G. Endlich, A Commentary on the Interpretation of Statutes § 478 (1888). State v. Allen, 14 Wash. 103, 44 P. 121 (1896); and see Ettor v. [City of] Tacoma, 57 Wash. 50, 106 P. 478, 107 P. 1061 State v. Zornes, 78 Wash.2d 9, 12, 475 P.2d 109 (1......
  • State v. Zornes
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 14 de maio de 1970
    ...Statutory Construction § 286(166) (2d ed. 1904); G. Endlich, A Commentary on the Interpretation of Statutes § 478 (1888). State v. Allen, 14 Wash. 103, 44 P. 121 (1896); And see Ettor v. Tacoma, 57 Wash. 50, 106 P. 478, 107 P. 1061 However, in 1901 the legislature enacted Laws of 1901, Ex.S......
  • Libby v. Southern P. Co.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 16 de outubro de 1923
    ... ... the suit, because our jurisdiction is gone." ... The ... rule is thus stated by Mr. Chief Justice Bean in State v ... Ju Nun, 53 Or. 1, 8, 98 P. 513, 514: ... "It is settled that the repeal of a law conferring ... jurisdiction takes away all ... v. Grinnell, 123 U.S. 679, 8 S.Ct. 260, 31 L.Ed. 278; ... Keller v. State, 12 Md. 322, 71 Am. Dec. 596; ... State v. Allen, 14 Wash. 103, 44 P. 121; Mahoney ... v. State, 5 Wyo. 520, 42 P. 13, 63 Am. St. Rep. 64; ... Aaron v. State, 40 Ala. 307; Higginbotham ... ...
  • State v. Ju Nun
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 15 de dezembro de 1908
    ... ... Stat. Const. 553, 554; Ex parte McCardle, 7 Wall. 506, 19 ... L.Ed. 264; Insurance Co. v. Ritchie, 5 Wall. 541, 18 ... L.Ed. 540; Sherman v. Grinnell, 123 U.S. 679, 8 ... Sup.Ct. 260, 31 L.Ed. 278; Keller v. State, 12 Md ... 322, 71 Am.Dec. 596; State v. Allen, 14 Wash. 103, ... 44 P. 121; Mahoney v. State, 5 Wyo. 520, 42 P. 13, ... 63 Am.St.Rep. 64; Aaron v. State, 40 Ala. 307; ... Higginbotham v. State, 19 Fla. 557. The ... constitutional amendment in question did not in terms repeal ... the law conferring jurisdiction ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT