State v. Alm, 36810
| Citation | 246 Minn. 568,75 N.W.2d 212 |
| Decision Date | 17 February 1956 |
| Docket Number | No. 36810,36810 |
| Parties | The STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Warren H. ALM, Appellant. |
| Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
Warren H. Alm, pro se.
Miles Lord, Atty. Gen., Charles E. Houston, Sol. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.
Plaintiff moves for a dismissal of the appeal of the defendant from the order of the District Court of Kandiyohi County denying defendant's petition for a writ of coram nobis. The motion is made upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not served either upon the county attorney or the attorney general. Defendant concedes that such service was not made. The appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 1
1 See, M.S.A. §§ 632.02, 605.03; State v. Besse, 160 Minn. 533, 200 N.W. 356; State v. Newman, 188 Minn. 461, 247 N.W. 576. Whether the review should be some other remedy than appeal we need not determine.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Danielsen v. Tahash
...and service of such notice upon the attorney general is jurisdictional. State v. Newman, 188 Minn. 461, 247 N.W. 576; State v. Alm, 246 Minn. 568, 75 N.W.2d 212; State v. Morrissey, 259 Minn. 563, 108 N.W.2d 10; State v. Collins, 260 Minn. 171, 109 N.W.2d 327; State v. Ettesvold, 263 Minn. ......
-
State v. Alm, 38292
...by us because of defendant's failure to serve his notice of appeal on either the county attorney or the attorney general. State v. Alm, 246 Minn. 568, 75 N.W.2d 212. Although the defendant has served the full term to which he was sentenced for grand larceny, he apparently attacks the judgme......
-
State v. Higgins
...762; State ex rel. Treat v. District Court, 124 Mont. 234, 221 P.2d 436; State v. Newman, 36 N.J.Super. 506, 116 A.2d 585; State v. Alm, 246 Minn. 568, 75 N.W.2d 212; State v. Collins, 260 Minn. 171, 109 N.W.2d 327; State v. Young, 255 Iowa 447, 122 N.W.2d 847; State v. Thomas, 238 Iowa 998......
-
State v. Cage, 38646
...The trial court correctly denied it. Affirmed. 1 State ex rel. Farrington v. Rigg, 248 Minn. 49, 78 N.W.2d 721; State v. Alm, 246 Minn. 568, 75 N.W.2d 212.2 See, State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379, 68 N.W.2d 217; State ex rel. Barness v. County of Hennepin, 252 Minn. 174, 89 N.W.2d 166.3 State e......