State v. Almanza

• Decision Date: 13 December 2018
• Docket Number: A17A1270
• Citation: 822 S.E.2d 406 (Mem),348 Ga.App. 290
• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
• Parties: The STATE v. ALMANZA.

348 Ga.App. 290

822 S.E.2d 406 (Mem)

The STATE

v.ALMANZA.

A17A1270

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

December 13, 2018

D. Victor Reynolds, District Attorney, Michael S. Carlson, Charles P. Boring, Amelia G. Pray, John R. Edwards, Lindsay B. Gardner, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellant.

The Merchant Law Firm, Ashleigh B. Merchant, John B. Merchant III ; Cindi L. Yeager, for appellee.

Melvin L. Hewitt, Jr. ; Brian K. Fortner, Emily K. Richardson, Sean A. Garrett; Andrew H. Agatston ; Donna Coleman-Stribling, Anna W. Davis, amici curiae.

Gobeil, Judge.

In State v. Almanza , 304 Ga. 553, 820 S.E.2d 1 (2018), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the judgment of this Court in State v. Almanza , 344 Ga. App. 38, 807 S.E.2d 517 (2017). Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own. In accordance with that opinion, we vacate that part of the trial court's order finding inadmissible statements made by the mother of the alleged child molestation victim to the child's physicians, in which the mother identified Almanza as the perpetrator of the alleged molestation. We remand for the trial court to consider whether the statements at issue are admissible under OCGA § 24-8-803 (4), pursuant to the test set forth in United States v. Renville , 779 F.2d 430 (8th Cir. 1985).

Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.

McFadden, P. J., and Coomer, J., concur.