State v. Ames

Decision Date18 April 1985
Docket NumberNo. 65445,65445
Citation10 Fla. L. Weekly 229,467 So.2d 994
Parties10 Fla. L. Weekly 229 STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jeffrey AMES, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for respondent.

OVERTON, Justice.

This cause is before this Court on petition to review the First District Court of Appeal decision in State v. Ames, reported as 449 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), in which that court certified the following question to be of great public importance:

Whether the crimes for which the defendant was sentenced to consecutive three-year mandatory minimum terms pursuant to Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes, were "offenses [which arose] from separate incidents occurring at separate times and places" within the meaning of the rule announced in Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983).

449 So.2d at 827 (emphasis in original). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed, we answer the question in the negative and approve the decision of the district court of appeal.

In the instant case, Ames was convicted of burglary of a dwelling while armed, robbery with a deadly weapon, and sexual battery with a deadly weapon. The circumstances leading to these convictions reflect that Ames pushed his way into the victim's house, knocked her to the floor, and threatened to kill her if she did not stop screaming. He then forced her into an adjoining room and demanded money. The victim complied. Ames led the victim through the house in a quest for more money and, when the victim informed him that she had only jewelry, he proceeded to her bedroom where the victim removed the jewelry from a dresser. While in the bedroom, Ames raped the victim. Ames used a firearm throughout this episode.

The trial court imposed a life sentence for burglary while armed to be served concurrently with a life sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon. A life sentence was also imposed for sexual battery with a deadly weapon, to be served consecutively to the burglary and robbery sentences. In imposing each sentence, the trial judge checked the block indicating that a three-year minimum mandatory sentence, pursuant to the provisions of section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1981), was applicable. Thus, Ames received two consecutive three-year mandatory minimum sentences. On appeal, the district court reversed the imposition of consecutive mandatory minimum sentences. The district court cited the following statement made by this Court in Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983), as authority for its holding: "By this holding, we do not prohibit ... consecutive mandatory minimum sentences for offenses arising from separate incidents occurring at separate times and places." Id. at 4.

We agree with the decision of the district court. In Palmer, this Court reversed the imposition of thirteen consecutive three-year mandatory minimum sentences imposed by the trial court pursuant to section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1981), on thirteen counts of armed robbery. The defendant in that case walked into a funeral parlor during...

To continue reading

Request your trial
33 cases
  • Haye v. State, 92-1019
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Marzo 1993
    ...754 (Fla.1988); Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120, 1123-1124 (Fla.1986); State v. Thomas, 487 So.2d 1043, 1044 (Fla.1986); State v. Ames, 467 So.2d 994, 995-996 (Fla.1985); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1, 3-4 (Fla.1983). In State v. Boatwright, 559 So.2d 210 (Fla.1990), the supreme court stated......
  • Junco v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 Febrero 1987
    ...act of transporting the victim to the rape site, thus rendering the rape a consequence of the kidnapping. Similarly, in State v. Ames, 467 So.2d 994 (Fla.1985), the defendant was found to have engaged in one continuous episode where he burglarized the victim's home, then robbed her in one r......
  • Bonner v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Abril 2018
    ...that in Walton II , which quashed our en banc decision in Walton v. State , 106 So.3d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). See also State v. Ames , 467 So.2d 994 (Fla. 1985) ; Lanham v. State , 60 So.3d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) ; Roberts v. State , 990 So.2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ; Perry v. State , 97......
  • Kelly v. State, 88-350
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 13 Julio 1989
    ...arising from independent incidents occurring at separate times and places. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983). Compare, State v. Ames, 467 So.2d 994 (Fla.1985) (consecutive minimum mandatory sentences improper because the convictions fail to arise from separate incidents); Wilson v. St......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT