State v. Anderson

CourtWashington Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtGORDON, J.
CitationState v. Anderson, 20 Wash. 193, 55 P. 39 (Wash. 1898)
Decision Date21 November 1898
PartiesSTATE v. ANDERSON.

Appeal from superior court, Chehalis county; Charles W. Hodgdon Judge.

W. H Anderson was convicted of burglary, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Geo. D Schofield, for appellant.

W. H. Abel, for the State.

GORDON J.

The defendant was convicted in the superior court for Chehalis county of the crime of burglary, and sentenced to three years' imprisonment in the penitentiary. He has appealed.

Respondent has moved to strike from the transcript certain affidavits which purport to have been submitted to the trial court in support of defendant's motion for a new trial, but which were not incorporated in any bill of exceptions or statement of facts. The motion must prevail. State v. Howard, 15 Wash. 425, 46 P. 650; Clay v. Irrigation Co., 14 Wash. 545, 45 P. 141.

It is urged in appellant's brief that the prosecution should have been by indictment, and not by information; and, in support of this position, appellant contends that there is nothing upon the face of the record disclosing that the grand jury was not in session at the time the information was filed. The defendant did not move against the information in the lower court, nor make any objection thereto, prior to entering his plea of not guilty; and it does not affirmatively appear that the court erred in overruling his objection to the introduction of testimony.

Nor did the court err in permitting the prosecuting witness, and also the witness Beamer, upon redirect examination, to testify to an altercation occurring between appellant and the prosecuting witness some months prior to the alleged burglary, for the reason that the appellant himself had introduced the subject in his cross-examination of these witnesses.

It is asserted that, at the close of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • State v. Louie
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • April 7, 1966
    ... ...         The defendant should be granted a new trial ...         ROSELLINI, C.J., concurs ... --------------- ... 1 State v. Williams, 13 Wash. 335, 43 P. 15 (1895); State v. Anderson, 20 Wash. 193, 55 P. 39 (1898); State v. Mitchell, 32 Wash. 64, 72 P. 707 (1903); State v. Fillpot, 51 Wash. 223, 98 P. 659 (1908); State v. Lewis, 65 Wash. 485, 118 P. 626 (1911); State v. Andrews, 71 Wash. 181, 127 P. 1102 (1912); State v. McBride, 72 Wash. 390, 130 P. 486 (1913); State v ... ...
  • State v. Tyler
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • December 4, 2003
    ... ... Anderson, 20 Wash. 193, 55 P. 39 (1898)) ...         A party opens the door when it introduces inadmissible evidence in direct or cross-examination. 5 Karl B. Tegland, Washington Practice: ...         Evidence Law and Practice sec. 103.14, at 52 (4th ed. 1999). The opposing party may then ... ...
  • State v. Gefeller
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • July 31, 1969
    ...[458 P.2d 21] (1935); State v. Ward, 144 Wash. 337, 258 P. 22 (1927); State v. Hempke, 121 Wash. 226, 209 P. 10 (1922); State v. Anderson, 20 Wash. 193, 55 P. 39 (1898). Defendant, citing State v. Emmanuel, 42 Wash.2d 1, 253 P.2d 386 (1953), directs his third assignment of error to the pros......
  • State v. Wood
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1903
    ... ... way. Affidavits, like all other evidence introduced at the ... trial of the cause, must be brought into this court by a bill ... of exceptions or a statement of facts, and this is the rule ... in criminal as well as in civil cases. State v ... Anderson, 20 Wash. 193, 55 P. 39; Chevalier & Co. v ... Wilson, 30 Wash. 227, 70 P. 487. But, while the record ... brought here by the appellant fails to present the question ... suggested by him, the prosecuting attorney, in a spirit of ... fairness that is commendable, has made ... ...
  • Get Started for Free