State v. Anderson
| Decision Date | 12 July 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. SC04-261.,SC04-261. |
| Citation | 879 So.2d 624 |
| Parties | STATE v. ANDERSON. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Anderson
...to meet. We have jurisdiction, see art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., and granted review to resolve the conflict. See State v. Anderson, 879 So.2d 624 (Fla.2004) (granting In deciding which harmless error standard applied, neither court based its decision on the type of post-conviction motion ......
-
Williams v. State, 2D03-1563.
... ... Because we have no basis for concluding that the sentencing court would have imposed the same sentence if the court had employed a correct scoresheet, we reverse and remand for the trial court to resentence Williams. See Gill v. State, 886 So.2d 988, 991 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Anderson" v. State, 865 So.2d 640, 642 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 879 So.2d 624 (Fla.2004) ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Brotons v. State, 4D04-3178.
... ... We reverse ... Summary denial was improper. Nothing from the record was attached to the order of denial that conclusively showed the trial court would have imposed the same sentence despite the scoresheet error. See Anderson v. State, 865 So.2d 640, 642-43 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 879 So.2d 624 (Fla.2004); accord Cruz v. State, 884 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (finding it was error for trial court to deny appellant's request for resentencing hearing when it granted his 3.800(b)(2) motion to 889 So.2d 175 correct ... ...