State v. ANTWON W.
| Decision Date | 07 April 2010 |
| Citation | State v. Antwon W., 991 A.2d 568, 295 Conn. 922 (Conn. 2010) |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. ANTWON W. |
Neal Cone, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn.App. 180, 982 A.2d 1112 (2009), is denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
-
Antwon W. v. Comm'r of Corr.
...from 2002 through 2003 at his uncle's home. State v. Antwon W ., 118 Conn.App. 180, 181–84, 982 A.2d 1112 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 922, 991 A.2d 568 (2010). In 2006, the petitioner, who was eighteen years old at the time of the assaults, was convicted of one count of sexual assault i......
-
State v. Hickey
...of the fifth amendment. This claim is foreclosed by State v. Antwon W., 118 Conn.App. 180, 982 A.2d 1112 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 922, 991 A.2d 568 (2010). In that case, just as here, the defendant's conviction of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of § 53a–70 (a)(2) and......
-
State v. Smith
...omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Antwon W. , 118 Conn.App. 180, 186–87, 982 A.2d 1112 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 922, 991 A.2d 568 (2010). It is the final protection that is implicated in the present case."In determining whether two offenses are the same offense for......
-
State v. Inglis
...Accordingly, it does not merit Golding review.” State v. Antwon W., 118 Conn.App. 180, 201, 982 A.2d 1112 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 922, 991 A.2d 568 (2010). That logic applies equally in the present case. Claims pertaining to the adequacy of a court's instructions on misidentificatio......
Get Started for Free